We’ve seen beyond a shadow of doubt that the Occupy Wall Street protesters don’t understand economics and don’t understand the source of our financial problems. Until now, though, I could say, “But at least they all understand bailing out the banks was a bad idea.” Unfortunately, even that was too charitable.
The first professional survey data about the protesters is out, and the information is pretty interesting. The thing that really jumped out at me, though, was the news that half of the protesters believe the big bank bailouts were necessary.
So let’s try to wrap our heads around this. They are angry that the banks got our money, so they’re protesting there. But a full half of the protesters believe it was necessary for the government to give billions and billions of dollars to the banks. How do their heads not explode from holding this contradiction inside?
Do these people not understand that businesses which take unwise chances and lose deserve to go out of business? Do they not understand that what economist Joseph Schumpeter called “creative destruction” is necessary for the market to work?
The survey from which this information comes was done by long-time Democratic Party pollster Douglas Schoen. Anyone who’s under the illusion that these are just frustrated mainstream types hurting from the bad economy needs to listen to what Schoen writes about them:
Life cycles sometimes bring us back to places where we’ve been
Maybe it wasn’t correct choice, but I’m not having surgery Friday
ObamaCare must fail in long term, but conservatives can’t stop it now
Search for ‘more’ can leave us craving what we haven’t found
Goodbye, Charlotte (2009-2016)
When people show you who they are, trust their actions, not words
Would you be glad or ashamed if others could read your thoughts?
Assassin or patsy? How can you trust any of the players in this case?