• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

David McElroy

An Alien Sent to Observe the Human Race

  • About
  • Podcasts

What if non-taxpayers had no say in government taxing, spending?

By David McElroy · November 29, 2012

Note: I don’t edit old articles such as this one, because they were what I believed to be accurate when I wrote them, but I have finally discovered almost four years later that the source of this graphic was actually a Buzzfeed article about what the results would have been if only white people had voted. The article will remain as it is, but please do not use this to make a political point about voting, because that might or might not be accurate. (I suspect if non-taxpayers were excluded from voting, the results would have been what I said here, but the data isn’t there to say so.) If you’d like to know why I don’t think it matters to argue these points, you’re welcome to read this article from July 2016 explaining how my priorities have changed in the past few years.

As long as you’re 18 years old and can fog a mirror, any U.S. citizen can vote. But what if we made one simple rule change? What if you had to have paid income taxes to be eligible to vote?

According to a graphic which has been attributed to CNN, the network looked at exit poll data from the election and told us what would have happened in the recent presidential election. After subtracting voters who pay no income taxes, Barack Obama would have won only 11 states. Instead of 332 electoral votes, he would have had only 97 electoral votes. (Click the map for a bigger copy.) Mitt Romney would have beaten him by a margin of 4.5 to 1 in electoral votes. It would have been a blowout win for the Republicans.

I was surprised to see CNN even point this out, because the suggestion that this is even a legitimate way to look at the data isn’t something that is typically brought up in polite company. The idea that people who don’t pay taxes are “second-class citizens” in some way is enough to get you declared racist and any other pejorative that some folks can think of.

But let’s think about it. Why is it that people who don’t pay taxes — which is about half the population — get to decide who pays taxes and how much money the actual taxpayers have to pay? What right do they have to have anything to say on such matters? If they’re not contributing to the money — and have nothing to lose from demanding higher taxes — why should they be allowed to have a say about what money is raised and how it’s spent?

I wrote satirically Tuesday about this dilemma — that of individuals being treated as equals when it comes to dividing power, but those with higher income and more wealth being required to shoulder the burden of supporting the rest when it comes to paying the bills. Why is it impolite to point this out? Why is it wrong for those who pay taxes to say to the non-taxpayer, “You aren’t paying anything, so you have no right to say how much the rest of us have to pay or how it should be spent”?

The progressive movement was largely a reaction to the belief that the lower classes  weren’t having any say in how the country was governed. In the last hundred years or so, that situation has been changed in radical ways. If you don’t understand history, you might not understand how dangerous this is or why the original system was set up as it was. (Remember that I oppose the state in any of its forms, but don’t take my explanations about the original system as compared to the current system to be an endorsement of the old system if we can “return to the original Constitution.”)

The founders of this country were strongly opposed to democracy, so the United States was never intended by its founders to be a democracy. You won’t find that mentioned in history books anymore, and most historians have ignored the point. (I doubt most historians today could even explain the difference between a democracy and a republic.) The fact that most of these historians are philosophically on the progressive left has clouded their ability to tell the truth about the past.

For instance, in the Federalist Papers No. 10 and No. 51, James Madison wrote:

“Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”

You can find example after example of similar statements. They saw democracies — those places in which every person has an equal say in everything — to be unstable and evil. Yet that’s what we’ve become — and that form of government is now glorified and praised by our textbooks, teachers and presidents.

In a republic, the rights and interests of various groups are supposed to be protected and respected. It’s understood that those with wealth and higher income deserve to have their interests protected, because their interests are very different from those of the lower classes. In the same way, a republic is supposed to protect the interests of those lower classes as well.

The American founders came up with a system of checks and balances in the legislative system that was supposed to force a balance between the two groups. Have you ever wondered why we have two houses in Congress, instead of the one which is typical all over the world in parliamentary systems? It’s because the Senate was supposed to protect the interests of the existing power structure and the House of Representatives was supposed to protect the interests of the lower classes.

If you look at the history of the Roman Republic, the picture will be much more clear. In Rome — far before it turned into an empire — the Senate was supposed to be a wise body of men, but they represented mostly the upper classes. The struggle for power within the Roman Republic was between the upper classes, represented mostly by the Senate, and the tribune of the Plebs, who represented the lower classes.

This is far too complex to explain how it developed here, but if you’re interested, I recommend an excellent six-part series of Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History podcast called “Death Throes of the Republic.” Listen to all six parts and then compare it to what’s gone on in this country for 200 years and you’ll be wondering why people aren’t noticing the parallels.

The American founders came up with this compromise that didn’t allow any legislation to pass unless it could pass the Senate and the House, so either group had an effective veto on things that went too far outside of their own interests.

Think about the name of the U.S. House. It’s called the “House of Representatives,” because it was designed to represent everybody. It was the body that was designed to be democratic. The Senate, however, was more like the old Roman Senate. It represented the Establishment.

Did you know that U.S. senators used to be selected by state legislatures? They were chosen by the legislature because those were the people who were going to represent the interests of the individual states — and the interests of the states were going to coincide with the interests of the upper classes in those states. It wasn’t until 1913 that direct election of senators came about, because of the desires of progressives to hand more power to the lower classes.

The founders’ compromise system that tried to split up power in this way was an ingenious effort to solve the problem. It wasn’t perfect by any means, but it at least accepted the idea that not everybody had the same interests — and that those interests needed to be protected in different ways.

After the progressive reforms of the last hundred years, power has shifted. The half of the country that pays zero income taxes has just as much political power as the half that pays all the income taxes. Is it any wonder that we’re seeing class warfare as the freeloaders — yes, that’s an accurate term in this context, not an insult — are increasingly demanding that those with money give them even more?

There isn’t a way to overcome this problem in any coercive system. No matter what safeguards you build in, one group or another is going to seize more and more power. For the purposes of simplicity, I’m ignoring the things that the people of the upper classes are doing to fight back through other means. Some of those means (such as pouring money into electing candidates who won’t bleed them dry) are legitimate and others of them (such as getting their pockets lined because of backroom dealing) are very illegitimate.

This is yet another reason why we need to be able to go our own separate ways if we desire. If some people want to set up and live under a pure democracy or representative democracy in which power is equally distributed, that’s their right. If others want to live in a proprietary enclave that protects their wealth and income by preventing the governing structure from taking the money — essentially a private city — that’s their right. If others want to live in communes or socialist utopias, that’s their right, too.

There’s no reason for there to be “one size fits all” for the 325 million or so who live here. There’s no reason we can’t all live under the systems we choose. It requires us to give up the notion that we have any claim on anybody else. It requires us to accept that we own ourselves and what we produce — and that other people own themselves and what they produce.

If we accept that and accept that we have the right to split up as we want to, we can all live as we choose. If we keep trying to live as we’re living now, what was once an experiment with building a republic will end just as badly as the Roman Republic.

The Roman Republic devolved into an empire. If we’re not there yet, we’re at least in a gray area. The Roman Empire eventually collapsed. The American Empire is in danger of collapsing for many of the same reasons. We need to be thinking about what we’re doing to do when the day of collapse gets here, because it’s coming.

Update: I now have reason to doubt whether CNN produced the graphic that appears with this article. As I originally noted, I was surprised to see such information coming from a mainstream news source. I can’t say now where the map came from, but the origin of the graphic doesn’t change the point I made, so I’m leaving it with this disclaimer.

Share on Social Networks

Related Posts

  • Attention word nerds: March forth, to celebrate National Grammar DayAttention word nerds: March forth, to celebrate National Grammar Day
  • Apple’s Steve Jobs is dead
  • What is this old longing for home? It’s the need for unconditional love

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

I stopped at the Cahaba River bridge on I-459 just I stopped at the Cahaba River bridge on I-459 just south of Birmingham to catch this sunset shot on the way home from work Tuesday evening. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
Just after I left the office Friday afternoon, I s Just after I left the office Friday afternoon, I saw this beautiful sunset and had to stop to record it. I accidentally shot it with too high an ISO, so it’s far more grainy than it should have been. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I love the way the moon looks through the bare bra I love the way the moon looks through the bare branches of a tree in my front yard tonight. On a cold night such as this one, it can sometimes seem as though the winter will never end and spring will never arrive. #nature #naturephotography #sky #night #tree #moon #birmingham #alabama
Ever since a neighbor strung some decorative light Ever since a neighbor strung some decorative lights in his back yard a year or so ago, I’ve been trying to figure out how to photograph them. In person, the effect is stunning on the yard, but I’ve struggled to figure out any sort of perspective that would be interesting. I’m still not entirely happy with this, but it’s th best I’ve been able to come up with so far. #lights #backyard #birmingham #alabama
It’s 27 degrees in Birmingham after midnight, bu It’s 27 degrees in Birmingham after midnight, but the thick fog covering my neighborhood right now makes it feel magical enough to ignore the miserable cold for a few minutes. #nature #naturephotography #fog #trees #night #birmingham #alabama
As I was getting into the car after work just afte As I was getting into the car after work just after 5 p.m., I looked up and saw this beautiful full moon shining through the bare limbs of a nearby tree. #nature #naturephotography #tree #moon #birmingham #alabama
Here are the top nine photos I’ve posted on this Here are the top nine photos I’ve posted on this account in 2020, as determined by your “likes.” #topnine
It’s very foggy in my neighborhood as Lucy and I It’s very foggy in my neighborhood as Lucy and I take our walk late Saturday night. #nature #naturephotography #fog #trees #night #birmingham #alabama
The moonlight is bright and widely diffused in the The moonlight is bright and widely diffused in the heavy fog in my neighborhood tonight. #moonlight #trees #night #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Critter Instagram

Molly contemplates life late Monday night as she r Molly contemplates life late Monday night as she relaxes on her warming pad in the office. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #greeneyes #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
You might have noticed that Thomas always insists You might have noticed that Thomas always insists on wearing his white vest for photos. He’s very proper. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
I’m having dinner at a restaurant and just check I’m having dinner at a restaurant and just checked on the cats via CritterCam, which showed Thomas, left, and Merlin cuddled up as they slept. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Merlin is enjoying the warm Saturday afternoon sun Merlin is enjoying the warm Saturday afternoon sunshine in an office window. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturday
It’s a few minutes after 2 a.m. and it’s 27 de It’s a few minutes after 2 a.m. and it’s 27 degrees outside, but Lucy has decided it’s time to go for another walk. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Thomas poses for a rather introspective Friday por Thomas poses for a rather introspective Friday portrait. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturdayeve
Thomas seems to think he’s a big cat as he explo Thomas seems to think he’s a big cat as he explores the office under my desk at lunch Friday. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
When Lucy went outside tonight, she didn’t seem When Lucy went outside tonight, she didn’t seem happy that it was so cold. She quickly let me know she was ready to come back inside. Once inside, she just looked at me with this puzzled look, as though she seemed to think maybe I could turn up the heat outside if I really wanted to. I’m convinced that our dogs believe we are gods. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
I just checked the remote CritterCam at home from I just checked the remote CritterCam at home from work and found all three of the cats cuddled up on their warming pad in an office chair. From left, it’s Molly, Thomas and Merlin. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)




Search

Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

Tyler Barnes will never be a basketball star. He probably peaked as a star high school player in Louisville, Ky. But for the last four years, he’s been a walk-on player for the University of Alabama. He’s a chemical engineering major with lots of academic honors who rides the bench because he loves being part of a team. He sometimes gets into games with a minute or two to go, but only if Alabama has a big lead. This Saturday, it was senior day for Alabama basketball, so it was his last chance to play in Coleman Coliseum. Alabama Coach Nate Oats says that one of the team starter’s came to him an hour before the game started — and fellow senior Alex Reese asked Oats if Barnes could start in his place for this one game. Even though the game was huge for Alabama, which is ranked No. 6 in the country and trying to wrap up an SEC title, Oats agreed. Barnes started and played the first three minutes, grabbing what was only the fourth rebound of his career and missing his only shot. Barnes has a great future as an engineer, but you’ll never again hear from him as a basketball player. For three shining minutes Saturday, though, he was a starter for a top-10 college basketball team — and his parents were in the stands from Kentucky to see it. There’s a lot of ugliness in college basketball right now, but this story makes me happy.

It was five years ago tonight when Lucy first rode in the car with me. She was on her way to her “forever home” with me that night, but she didn’t know it, so she was terrified. It was a much happier and braver girl who took a ride in the car tonight so we could go through a drive-through window and order a hamburger for her — to celebrate five years with me. She had a great time. If she could remember five years ago tonight, she would be proud of how far she’s come, too. If you’d like to know more about Lucy’s journey from scared dog to brave queen of the household, here’s something I wrote after her first year with me. I’m hoping this girl will have many more happy years with me.

I’ve never been attracted to skinny women. There’s nothing wrong with someone who’s naturally thin, but it’s never been my preference. What has shocked me, though, is the judgment I’ve heard from women all through my life — about themselves and others — about who’s “fat.” I concluded long ago that most women in our culture have been brainwashed to believe that skinny is attractive — and that anything other than skinny is ugly. I first assumed that I was the oddball — for preferring women with bigger and heavier bodies — but I’m coming to the conclusion that most men naturally feel this way to one extent or another. I just ran across new research by a couple of Northwestern University psychology professors that shows that women seriously overestimate how much a straight man will be attracted to a skinny woman. In a perfect world, we would all be at a healthy weight, but when it comes to attractiveness, too heavy is more attractive than skinny. At least to me — and to a lot of men, too.

Years ago, I heard a question that seemed very insightful at the time. You’ve probably heard it, too. What would you do if you knew you couldn’t fail? The question is intended to help you uncover things you really want to do, but which you’re afraid to try — for fear of failure. In an interview today, I heard the great marketing guru Seth Godin give a different point of view. He said the better question is to ask what you would do even if you knew it would fail. That struck me as far more insightful than the original version. We ought to be doing what we know is right, not what will maximize our success or praise from others. There are some battles that are worth fighting even if you believe you’re doomed to failure. Those battles are often for love or important ideas or our children. Some things are simply worth fighting for — and the truth is that you might win anyway. Do the right thing. Take the chance.

The more I understand about myself, about human nature and about the nature of reality, the more I realize I’m a radical by the standards of both Modernism and Postmodernism. Seeing the things which I’m stumbling toward makes me an enemy of many of the core ideas upon which contemporary culture is built. It exposes the culture as a monstrous lie — like a dangerous infection that’s slowly destroying what human were created to be. My “inner observer” has always known that truth was found in the ideas of the Enlightenment, but I’m slowly finding words to explain what has merely been instinct until now. The Enlightenment was humanity’s great leap forward, but shallow and arrogant thinkers for the next two centuries threw away the fruits of that achievement. We can’t go forward as a species until we go back to correct this intellectual and spiritual error — and part of that is acknowledging that our collective attempts to do away with our Creator will always fail.

Read More

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this ad. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and I thank you. (If you’re using an ad-blocker and can’t see the ad, you can click here instead.)

© 2011–2021 · All Rights Reserved
Built by: 1955 DESIGN