Dying Phelps’ anti-gay cult is vile and wrong, but I don’t hate him

By David McElroy · March 17, 2014

Fred Phelps is dying. That news has touched off rejoicing among many people who are angry and hurt about what Phelps has done with the anti-gay cult he founded in Kansas.

Phelps was the founder and former pastor of the group which calls itself the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas. But his story is complicated. The Mississippi-born Phelps was an award-winning civil rights lawyer early in his career. How do we reconcile that with the subsequent career of the man who’s best known for preaching that “God hates fags“?

On Facebook, I saw many angry comments after the news came out Sunday that he’s dying.

“I hope it’s an awful and traumatic death,” one woman wrote in what was typical of the attitudes I noticed.

I disagree with Phelps and the group he founded. They’re wrong theologically and in every other way. They’re full of hate and anger. The things they say and do are vile and mean. And they’re terribly arrogant.

But I don’t hate Phelps or the others who are still part of the cult. Despite the terrible things they’ve done — and the hurt they’ve inflicted on many people, including some I care about — I’m not going to bring myself to their level and hate them in return.

Hatred damages the hater more than anyone else. The worst punishment that could be inflicted on these people is having to live inside minds and hearts so full of poison. They’re punishing themselves more than anyone else ever could.

It appears that Phelps has actually been excommunicated from the cult. Two of his sons — both of whom escaped the group — report that he was tossed out, but the cult itself won’t confirm or deny that.

“We don’t owe any talk to you about that,” a Westboro spokesman told the Topeka Capital-Journal Sunday. “We don’t discuss our internal church dealings with anybody. It’s only because of his notoriety that you are asking.”

Did Phelps soften his views in his old age? Did he reject the hatred that he had preached? Or did he at least decide that maybe God didn’t hate gay people after all? This is pure speculation on my part, of course, but it’s hard for me to think of another reason he would have been thrown out of the group he founded.

Whatever the reason for the split, hate isn’t the appropriate reaction to hateful people such as this cult. There’s nothing to be gained by hating them. Even if Phelps goes to his grave full of hatred for gay people, it does us no good to poison our minds with hatred for him.

I feel sorry for Phelps and for people who live with thoughts and feelings such as what he preached. Anyone who can believe what he believed is an angry and tortured soul. Something in him was miserable and he had to find others to make miserable — to make the focus of his anger and hate.

You can believe that homosexuality is wrong without hating gay men and lesbian women. I’ve known a number of people who sincerely believe it’s wrong according to their reading of the Bible — which was the traditional Christian position — but who didn’t hate anyone as a result. There’s nothing wrong with that if that’s what you sincerely believe. We can reasonably disagree with each other about theology. Preaching that God has some special hatred for one group is simply theologically and morally wrong, though.

We might never know why Phelps chose gays to hate. Maybe he had felt some attraction to men at some point in his life and he turned that into a source for self-hating rhetoric and action against others. Although that, too, is pure speculation, there are all sorts of possibilities. All I’m sure of is that his life must have been miserable.

People frequently have a change of heart as they start approaching death. Maybe that’s what happened to him. Maybe not. I’d like to believe it, though. I’d like to believe that he could have experienced some sort of redemption as death approached.

Whether he did or not, I choose not to hate him or the other hateful people at Westboro. If you’re a fellow Christian, loving our enemies is what Jesus told us to do. If you’re not a Christian, it’s still in your self-interest.

Living with this sort of hate and anger is miserable. There’s no reason to willingly inflict it on yourself.

Forgive him instead. Overcome evil with good.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts