An emotional vampire craves you, but he doesn’t know how to love

By David McElroy · September 2, 2017

Ellen was sobbing as she told me her story. She was confused. She said she knew she wanted to leave Andrew, but she felt guilty.

“He kept saying how much he loves me,” Ellen said through tears. “Mostly he talked about how much he needs me and counts on me. He said, ‘Can’t you see how much I need you?’ over and over again.”

I’ve heard this story before from Ellen, because she’s gone through this more than once with the man she’s married to. Andrew ignores her and treats her badly. He’s more interested in spending time with his friends than in building any family life with her. He’s disdainful and critical of Ellen, openly mocking her in front of friends and family.

Being treated this way kills Ellen inside.

She married Andrew because he swept her off her feet and he treated her like a queen in the beginning. But his behavior was erratic. He gave her attention when her devotion to him waned, but he pulled away as soon as she was committed again. This happened several times. She broke their engagement once, but Andrew talked her into going ahead with the wedding. He kept telling her how much he needed her — and Ellen found intense comfort in having a man need her that much.

This week, she told him she was leaving. After spending weeks in counseling — something he refused to be part of — she got up the courage to tell him she was walking away. But now, once more, Andrew was putting on a charming and emotional show for her — and the centerpiece of it all is how much he needs her.

Ellen feels stuck. She doesn’t love Andrew anymore — she admits that — but how can she leave someone who needs her that much? His need must mean he loves her as much as he says he does — even though his actions don’t show it. How could he need her so much if he didn’t love her?

What Ellen doesn’t realize is that there’s a big difference between loving someone and needing someone. You should be very wary and very skeptical of the person who needs you but who doesn’t care about meeting your own expressed needs.

Andrew is an emotional vampire. The world is full of them. Their victims are those who desperately need love and desperately need to feel needed and wanted. The victims have trouble walking away, because at the moment they get the courage to leave, the vampire hands them just a small taste of the emotional satisfaction they crave — and that’s frequently enough to hold them where they are, stuck in the same cycle of constant disappointment punctuated by being made to feel (every now and then) loved and needed.

A vampire will take from you — in a greedy and uncaring way — when he needs something. When he doesn’t need you for the moment, he goes off on his own, ignoring your needs and desires completely. If you try to leave this one-sided relationship, he screams in pain at the potential loss of his source of emotional supply.

“You can’t leave me!” he will wail. “I need you. I’m counting on you. Can’t you see how much I love you?!”

And that’s just it. He thinks he loves you.

But an emotional vampire might not even know what love is — and if you’re willing to accept this relationship and be bound by its dysfunction — you might not know what healthy love is, either.

Talking with Ellen this week has left me thinking again about the complicated relationship between love and need. It’s something I’ve worried about for myself. When I need someone so badly, is it because I love her? Or is it because of something I can get from her? I wrote last year about my realization that the words “I love you” can frequently be very selfish because what the person can mean is, “Please love me. I’m desperate.”

I need to be needed. I crave it. Being needed makes me feel important to someone. It makes me feel as though I have more worth. Being needed makes me happy.

But what I really need is love — that mutual state of commitment to one another, with each striving to give to the other what he or she needs, not just to get what he or she wants.

The way I resolved the issue for myself is simple. I ask this question: “Do I want to give her what she needs and wants just as much as I crave something from her?” If my need is actually love, I will want to find ways to meet her needs — the things she wants and needs as she defines them. If I merely want what I can get from her, that’s selfish. That’s the mark of an emotional vampire.

Being needed feels good. I’ll always crave that. But it’s no substitute for being loved by someone who’s just as committed to me as I am to her. Being needed isn’t enough — and it never will be.

Genuine two-way relationships can be complicated and hard to find. There has to be a match between what the two people each want. If one wants and needs mutual love from the other — but the other isn’t willing to give what the first needs — the relationship can’t work. It has to end, because one person is going to end up giving and trying to earn something which can’t be earned.

Vampires need the emotional supply they can get from someone else. Vampires crave that emotional supply. But vampires don’t know how to give in healthy ways — and they suck out of you the love you could otherwise be giving to someone who’s ready to love in a healthy, mutual way.

The vampire doesn’t care about giving you what you need. The vampire cares only about giving you whatever it takes to keep you from leaving.

Ellen isn’t leaving Andrew for now. I doubt she ever will. He’s treating her well at the moment. He’s giving her the attention this weekend that he’s been denying her for months. Ellen seems certain he’s really changing this time.

She says she believes me when I tell her what’s going on. Her rational brain gets it. But her need to be needed keeps her locked into a relationship with a vampire — someone who will keep taking from her as much he can get.

Andrew will continue to give just enough to keep her from leaving — and he will continue to suck all the life and happiness out of Ellen.

Note: Actual names have been changed.

Share on Social Networks

I have no use for the theocratic and repressive government of Iran. The people who run the country are cruel at best and evil at worst. The Iranian people deserve freedom. But I have no personal quarrel with anybody in Iran. While I’m not thrilled about a future Iranian government having nuclear weapons, I’m just as concerned about nukes in the hands of politicians in Israel, Pakistan, India, China and Russia. I’m not even thrilled with the U.S., Britain and France having them, either, because I don’t trust any politicians to be responsible with such terrible weapons. All I can say with certainty is that American taxpayers have no business attacking Iran, especially since we’re being forced to pay for this attack in order to benefit the politicians of Israel — and nobody else. If Middle Eastern countries want to fight among themselves, that’s none of my business. It’s not the business of the U.S. government, either. I have no quarrel with anybody in Iran — and having the government which claims to represent me launch an unprovoked attack against a sovereign country will only make all Americans less safe in the near future. This attack is poorly conceived and morally unjustified. Remember that when the Iranians launch attacks that we will then condemn as “terrorism.” What the U.S. is doing right now looks like terrorism to me. And let’s not forget that the attack is the latest in a long line of unconstitutional wars by various U.S. presidents — who have no legal power to declare war on their own, according to the U.S. Constitution.

A child having a tantrum understands only one thing: Did I get my way or not? He doesn’t understand the issues involved. He doesn’t understand the reasons that went into a decision. He doesn’t understand any of the things that mature and reasonable adults have to understand in order to live healthy lives. By his reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down his disastrous tariff scheme, Donald Trump shows himself to be — once more — a screaming child having a tantrum. Outside the world of mob bosses who expect to get their way every time, normal adults don’t act this way, but Trump isn’t normal. He’s an angry and vengeful man who has narcissistic personality disorder. And we are in danger as a result. Trump doesn’t understand the legal issues involved in this ruling. He doesn’t understand economics. He doesn’t understand rule of law. He doesn’t understand that he can ever be wrong. All he understands is that he didn’t get his way. And he is now a narcissistic and raging little boy who also happens to hold life-and-death power over most humans on this planet. He’s dangerous — and the system which gives him that power is even more dangerous.

Is it an attempt to blur the gender line between men and women? Or is it some weird tribute to the traditional Scottish kilt? It’s hard to say, but fashion designers keep pushing for men to wear skirts in the last few years. Both men and women in modern fashion seem oddly androgynous, as though it would be offensive for a man to look manly or for a woman to look feminine. A CNN article about the latest fashions from Paris caught my attention Monday and left me wondering about the ugly clothes the designers are hawking. If a man wants to wear a skirt — or a kilt — that’s OK with me, but I’ll stick with a traditional dark suit with a white shirt and tie. (Well, when I’m not wearing t-shirts and sweats, of course.) I always wonder who actually buys the outlandish garb from fashion designers anyway. I would be humiliated to be seen in any of this stuff, but I obviously have no sense of high fashion.

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Related Posts