In a culture of cold, ‘no strings’ sex, only emotional intimacy fills needs

By David McElroy · March 3, 2018

I’ve started getting a lot of steamy email spam lately. The spam offers me no-strings-attached sex and all the pleasure I want. I’ve been fascinated by the marketing approach — because some percentage of men must find this attractive.

Helen recently uploaded some XXX pix that you need 2 see!! She lives in your area and is looking for a Man 4 a “One Night Stand”!!

Local Singles and Wild Milfs online 4 NSA Flings – Quick Sex Assured with as many Cheating Housewives as you Wish

No Strings Attached Sex, Perfect for One Night Stands. No Strings – No Distractions just Pleasures!!!

Some people are so scared of emotional vulnerability that sex is their only substitute — and they end up never understanding the difference. I assume those are the people who are clicking these links.

Most people today seem driven by the pursuit of pleasure. They might call it the pursuit of happiness, but for most people, being happy means experiencing as much pleasure as possible — and this leads to ruin.

Have you ever had a problem with any addiction? I don’t just mean alcohol and other recreational drugs. I mean anything you turned to compulsively in order to make yourself feel better when you felt a deep sense of emptiness and dread. The addiction I’ve experienced is sugar-filled foods. I have used such foods for years to “self medicate” when I was lonely and unhappy.

My experience is that a little bit of sugar would initially fill the inner need, but the longer the need went unmet, the higher and higher I’d have to increase the levels of sugar intake. What might start as a few cookies might end up a few days later with a half gallon of ice cream every night.

And the sad reality is that I could never get enough. I would eat more and more and more — with the obvious negative effects on my health — but even that would end up not giving me the relief I craved. Despite such a horrible cycle — and despite understanding what I was doing — I would consume more and more and more. I’ve heard that this is a common pattern with anyone who’s trying to fill a need with some form of addictive behavior.

This is what I think a lot of people are doing today with sex. It’s why they can never get enough — and why they will never be satisfied. It’s because they’re trying to use sex to fill a need that sex can’t fill.

Sex is a wonderful part of the human experience. It can certainly bring wonderful pleasure, but it can’t fill our emotional need for connection. Because we have come to associate sex with intimacy, most people today seem confused. When they need intimacy, many people compulsively turn to sex — cold, empty, no-strings-attached sex with people to whom they have no connection.

Since the pleasure of sex is intense and wonderful, they feel in the moment that they’re getting what they need. But when the physical release is over, they’re still just as empty as before — still just as disconnected from the hearts and minds of the people whose bodies they use for what might best be called “mutual masturbation.”

And so they blame their partners. If she were better in bed, I wouldn’t feel this way, he might think. And so they turn to other partners — all of whom give them some initial rush of pleasure — but they remain just as emotionally empty as before.

If you’re afraid to be vulnerable and connect with someone else deeply, no amount of sex will ever take the place of that. If you have the connection and mutual vulnerability that allow you to truly feel as though your heart is full, sex will be a glue which ties you even closer with that person.

Philosopher Emily Esfahani Smith points out that chasing happiness can make us unhappy — and I think this applies just as strongly to chasing pleasure. The more you chase whatever external things which you assume will make you happy, the more you’ll find that those things don’t work.

Over and over lately, I’ve run across thinkers who encourage that we pursue meaning instead of happiness and pleasure. Smith is another one of those — and she said in a recent TED talk that there are four pillars of a meaningful life:

• Belonging — Some belonging is shallow and not worth much. What we need is true belonging that comes from emotional vulnerability with people who love us as we are. That comes from a primary romantic relationship in most cases and then it’s aided by connection to family and close friends.

• Purpose — This gives you something to live for and something to drive yourself forward, something that’s more than just about your achievements and happiness. Having a purpose makes you eager to do whatever you do, because you care about It as more than just a job or a duty.

• Stepping beyond yourself — This is something higher or spiritual, but what you call it doesn’t matter that much as long as it’s meaningful to you. For me, it’s a transcendent connection to the Creator I know as God. For other people, it might come from art or religion. It’s whatever makes you feel as though there’s something bigger that you’re a part of.

• Storytelling — This isn’t about writing fiction or making movies. It’s about creating a narrative for yourself — a coherent and understandable story of who you are and how you became the person you are. Such a narrative helps you to feel anchored in the world, because it explains to you where you fit.

An adult human’s physical needs include food, water, sex and other things which bring us either relief or pleasure. All of these things are good and have their place. But they can’t take the place of the things we need which can be filled only through emotional intimacy — which comes about by connection and vulnerability.

I don’t understand the minds of the men (or women) who are looking for one-night stands or who are looking for unlimited flings and pleasure. It’s not that I’m better than those people. It’s simply that I know how empty that path is.

If you’re empty inside and you’re craving human connection — as I have been for several years now — the only way to fill that is to find emotional intimacy with the right person. Pursuing it through the pleasures of endless sex will never produce anything except disappointment and more emptiness.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts