Is there life on Mars? Is there love? Where can we find what’s missing?

By David McElroy · December 6, 2018

I have always felt like an alien among human beings. Or maybe I thought I was the human and almost everybody else was an alien. I’m not certain.

I’ve never hated the creatures among whom I walked. I just felt disconnected. I felt as if I was in the wrong place. I felt as if I was looking for something — someone? some place? — where I would find my own kind. Somewhere I would feel loved and understood. Somewhere I would feel at home. With someone I could trust. No longer the strange alien who didn’t fit.

I’ve recently found a line from an old song playing over and over in my head when I encounter things which make me feel this way. It happened again tonight. When I feel detached and troubled about what’s all around me, I feel myself withdrawing emotionally and I hear David Bowie singing bits and pieces of a song — and I always hear, over and over — the line which goes, “Is there life on Mars?”

And I feel like an alien who’s spent years looking for what he needs on Earth and he turns away in hurt and sorrow, asking whether there might be love and life for him on Mars instead.

Although many music critics consider this Bowie’s best song, the lyrics confuse most people. The words make sense to me, though, especially in light of Bowie’s explanation of the song. He admitted that the song was his reaction to having fallen in love with a woman and having the relationship not work out. Without being specific, he explained that the song is “a sensitive young girl’s reaction to the media.”

“I think she finds herself disappointed with reality,” Bowie said in an interview. “Although she’s living in the doldrums of reality, she’s being told that there’s a far greater life somewhere, and she’s bitterly disappointed that she doesn’t have access to it.”

That describes my place in the world, too. The girl looks at the world around her — and she looks at the cess pool of popular media described in the song — and she asks in frustration, “Is there life on Mars?”

Tonight at dinner in a restaurant, there was a television blaring anger and discord from a news channel. The people around me were arguing with one another, some in nasty ways. There was tension between couples. Children were ignored or rudely controlled. I didn’t feel love or affection between these people. I didn’t sense peace or contentment. I just sensed discord and anger and resentment and disillusionment.

If this is what life is like on Earth, is there life on Mars instead?

What would life elsewhere be like? It wouldn’t be perfect, because there aren’t any perfect people. (And if there were any perfect people, I wouldn’t fit among them, would I?) But if there were love and life on Mars, there would be loving families and loving couples. There would be heartfelt talk about things that matter. There would be more happiness about being together instead of a desire to separate from one another as quickly as possible. There would be hope and there would be genuine communication. There would be trust and honesty.

Why do I see life somewhere else in that way? I can’t give you a good reason other than to say it’s fantasy. Don’t we fantasize about life being what we lack where we are? This is the world I’m looking for. These are the people I’m looking for. These are all the things I need — love, understanding, trust, honesty, communication, hope, sharing and so on.

When I was a teen-ager, I read all the science fiction I could get my hands on. Most of it was filled with action and adventure and fighting and winning. But “Journey Between Worlds” was very different. The protagonist is a young woman whose father gives her a ticket to Mars as a graduation present. She doesn’t want to hurt his feelings, but she doesn’t really want this trip. She has a relationship with a man who she plans to marry. He’s not very attentive, but he’s impressive to others and he’s what she assumes she needs.

Over the course of the book, we spend a lot of time inside that young woman’s head. We see her interact with the man she believes is the man of her dreams. We also see her interact — more and more as the story develops — with another man. This guy is going to Mars as a settler. She can’t imagine why anyone would value something other than the wealthy life she had wanted on Earth with the guy of her dreams.

By the very end of the book, she finds herself faced with a choice between the two men — and the two worlds they represent, which is really about two entirely different ways of living and thinking and loving.

In the real world, I haven’t found a way to make that nice, clean choice that the woman in the book got to make. I face the world that I know every day. I see what I don’t want. Every now and then, I glimpse a promise of what might exist somewhere else — but then it disappears in smoke and I’m left more alone than ever.

If I can’t find what I need here, where will it be? Is it nowhere on Earth, at least for me? Is there life and love for me on Mars? Or is there life and love for me anywhere, with anybody?

Share on Social Networks

Is it an attempt to blur the gender line between men and women? Or is it some weird tribute to the traditional Scottish kilt? It’s hard to say, but fashion designers keep pushing for men to wear skirts in the last few years. Both men and women in modern fashion seem oddly androgynous, as though it would be offensive for a man to look manly or for a woman to look feminine. A CNN article about the latest fashions from Paris caught my attention Monday and left me wondering about the ugly clothes the designers are hawking. If a man wants to wear a skirt — or a kilt — that’s OK with me, but I’ll stick with a traditional dark suit with a white shirt and tie. (Well, when I’m not wearing t-shirts and sweats, of course.) I always wonder who actually buys the outlandish garb from fashion designers anyway. I would be humiliated to be seen in any of this stuff, but I obviously have no sense of high fashion.

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

Related Posts