Taking a break from Facebook is a step to retake control over my life

By David McElroy · February 10, 2019

For many reasons, I’m leaving Facebook — at least temporarily.

I don’t like drama queens on Facebook who make a big deal of deleting their accounts, but I also don’t want to just disappear without explanation.

I’d like to just delete my account entirely, but I fear I might regret that at some point, so I’m taking a small step toward that eventual goal. At some point, I’ll re-evaluate things and decide whether to move on to de-activating or even deleting the entire account. For now, though, I’ve deleted both Facebook and Facebook Messenger from my iPhone and closed the browser tab in Safari on my MacBook.

I’ve mentioned this before, but I joined Facebook only because an ex-girlfriend wanted me to about 10 or 12 years ago. I didn’t really see the point of it. I eventually understood the point, but I don’t like the effect my use of Facebook is having on me.

Facebook has proven itself time and time again to be a company that doesn’t care about the privacy of its users. Listening to company reactions every time it’s caught doing something illegal or unethical makes it clear that its decision-makers simply don’t have the same values that I do.

Even if the company didn’t regularly prove how little it cares about its users, I don’t like the psychological effects Facebook has had on me. Many of those effects are the same with any form of social media, and I have strong reservations about every one of them. I’m just not ready to go so far as to ditch them all.

I use Twitter so sparingly that I’m not giving that one up yet. I do think Twitter is a toxic environment for a lot of people, but I follow fewer than 300 people there and aggressively block anybody who seems toxic. So for now, I might still appear on Twitter. But let’s be honest. How often does anything I have to talk about fit into a tweet?

For now, I’ll still be using Instagram, too, even though it’s owned by Facebook and has been making changes lately that I’m not happy about. Fortunately, the way I use Instagram — posting pictures of cats and dogs on one account and mostly nature on another account — doesn’t lend itself to the sort of toxic interactions which I want to get away from.

I tried to change my use of Facebook in ways that might have made it less toxic and I did make quite a bit of progress. I slashed my list of “friends” from 5,000 (the limit) to the current 692. As it stands now, I have more “followers” than actual connections, but this change still hasn’t been enough.

It’s hard to say whether my problems with Facebook are inherent to the service or they’re just flaws in me. I just know that I’ve ended up spending far too much time and energy on something which has a remarkably small positive return for me.

In a lot of ways, I suspect we were all better off before we knew the constant random thoughts of other people. In the past, we could have assumed most other people were like us — at least deep down — in their reasoning, their values and their temperament. For me, Facebook has made it impossible to maintain that fiction.

Seeing the raw and unfiltered thoughts of so many people — and coming face to face with evidence of such strong dysfunction in humanity — has been too much for me. When I stick with my own life and the lives of the people I know, that’s a scale I can emotionally deal with. When I’m hit with the tidal wave of what appears insanity in the public, it’s overwhelming.

For me, that creates an existential crisis. When I see the unfiltered nonsense which I see, it makes me feel despair that nothing can change — and that leads to inaction on my part. I want to narrow my focus to the things I can change.

There are some people with whom I never interact except on Facebook and I’ll miss some of those folks. But everything in life is a tradeoff — and the tradeoff I’m making now isn’t worth the effects it has on me. And it’s not as though nobody can get in touch with me. My real-world contact information is easy to find for anyone who’s interested.

I’m not under the delusion that “you’re going to miss me when I’m gone.” I’m not mad at anybody and I don’t feel unappreciated or any of the things the drama queens cite when they leave. I just need to retake some control over my life that I’ve given to social media — and this is a first step.

For now, I’m not deactivating the account. I’m changing my profile picture to make it clear what I’m doing and I’m posting a link to this article. One of the reasons I’m not immediately deactivating is that doing so caused some people to think I’d unfriended them when I did it for a couple of months about four years ago.

Media have played a huge role in my life in the past. I still love traditional print media, but they’re dying. I have almost no interest in consuming any form of broadcast media anymore, although I don’t rule out producing some form of media — mostly online — in the future.

I believe social media are destructive for our culture, but they’re just one element of a toxic brew that is making modern culture so ugly — and getting worse. More importantly for myself, I need my time and attention for other things which can help change my own life.

My articles here will continue to automatically publish to Facebook, but I won’t be posting anything else — and I won’t be reading anything that’s posted there.

If you need to get in touch with me, email to davidmcelroy@mac.com is the easiest way. And if you actually know me, you can always do something really old fashioned and pick up the phone to call.

Share on Social Networks

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

For four years, Donald Trump’s supporters screamed that everything that went wrong was the fault of Joe Biden. They were sometimes right and they were sometimes delusional. (Anybody who knows me understands that I can’t stand Biden any more than I can stand Trump, just for different reasons.) But for two months, Trump has rampaged through U.S. political life — vandalizing pretty much everything in sight — and the vast majority of his supporters are silent at best. Many watch as he blows up the world economy and they make excuses for him. They’re in absolute denial, even about things that Trump is doing very intentionally. Anybody who understands economics and history knows that tariffs are a terrible idea from a pragmatic point of view. Anybody who values individual freedom knows that tariffs are massive taxes on individuals — and they’re a tool of political control over the ability of people to trade freely. Trump is the antithesis of everything which political conservatives stood for just a few years ago. It’s far past time for people who claim to be conservatives to reclaim the principles and values which they used to claim — and stop this mad man before he can accelerate the day when we experience economic and social collapse. Open your eyes to reality and reject this lying narcissist.

Related Posts