If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

What do you love enough to want once more before life slips away?
Most of nature follows instinct, but humans often ignore voice
If you accept that you’re a fool, being wrong is a lot less scary
‘Cash for clunkers’ was an even bigger clunker than we first realized
THE McELROY ZOO: Here’s why Merlin enjoys autumn and spring
‘Post-racial’ America? We’re nowhere close to that — and may never be
I don’t understand YouTube fame, but I’m drawn toward it anyway
California teacher union gets power to veto online college classes
Schools’ one-size-fits-all rules are just excuse not to use judgement