Charlotte and her sisters got their names — from the writing Bronte sisters — because of their tendency to spend time with books. When she was a kitten, she had a “thing” for a specific copy of “Fahrenheit 451,” which I always thought was funny. In this week’s picture from the zoo, she’s atop a biography of 19th century English minister George Mueller a few days ago. I’ll bet they read the books when I’m not looking.
Rush Limbaugh is just as partisan and ignorant as MSNBC’s Ed Schultz
On Saturday, we looked at how insane and stupid the left-wing MSNBC host Ed Schultz was to charge a Republican U.S. senator with racism when there wasn’t a hint of it. Today, we look at how right-wing radio host Rush Limbaugh is just as partisan and ignorant in a knee-jerk way.
Late last week, Barack Obama sent 100 U.S. troops into Uganda to train government troops in how to fight against a violent religious group calling itself the Lord’s Liberation Army. I’m strongly opposed to Obama’s move to involve the United States in any country’s affairs, but that doesn’t mean the rebel group isn’t vicious and savage — as evidenced by this example of the group’s typical punishment for people who don’t co-operate, which is cutting off lips, noses and ears.
However, since Obama is supporting the faction attacking the Lord’s Liberation Army, that was good enough for Rush Limbaugh to give his support to those barbarians in a knee-jerk way. On Friday, Limbaugh’s website featured a story with this headline: “Obama Invades Uganda, Targets Christians.” The copy seems to be a transcript from Limbaugh’s show, on which he said:
Is Ed Schultz insane or just an idiot? It’s really hard to be sure anymore
Some of the people who are obsessed with race in this country are insane. It seems polite to assume they’re insane, because if they’re not, they’re just idiots.
MSNBC’s Ed Schultz is one of those insane people. Or he’s an idiot. Take your pick.
Here’s the latest insanity from Schultz and others who see racism hiding under every phrase spoken by people they don’t like. In a discussion of rolling back Barack Obama’s health care reforms, Sen. Jim Demint, R-S.C., said, “If we are able to stop Obama on this [health care law], it will be his Waterloo. It will break him.” Schultz repeated, “It will break him,” in an ominous tone and then accused Demint of being a racist for using the word “break” in relation to a black man.
Huh? Give me a break.
A couple of university professors support Schultz’s bizarro assertion. Dr. James Peterson, for instance, is director of “Africana studies” at Lehigh University, and he said that “break” is a racist verb, because it is “a term that was used to destroy, mentally and physically, slaves.”
Christmas looks different now, but I still see joy with eyes of a child
Dear FBI, NSA and all three-letter agencies: ‘We don’t trust you guys’
Time for anger? Dissent is good, but ask what the dissenters stand for
ObamaCare must fail in long term, but conservatives can’t stop it now
Dirty little secret: Politicians have incentive to whip up your fears
Goodbye, Anne (2009-2019)
I need responsibility for slaying dragons to protect those I love
Tools don’t make you great artist, but tools can change how you feel
Do you believe you’re free? Slavery by any other name is still slavery