I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
If you’re sure what’s important, everything else seems trivial
Relationships he couldn’t mend were tragedy of my father’s death
It’s odd how ‘choice’ can mean ‘no choice’ with the state involved
Freedom of the press is for everyone, not just those recognized by feds
Taking responsibility for mistakes is foreign concept in many lawsuits

THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Sam, the baby kitten I stole
THE McELROY ZOO: Here’s why Merlin enjoys autumn and spring
Slow death of painful past leaves me trapped in fog of depression