I was getting frustrated with the interview Sunday afternoon, but I wanted to keep things civil and polite.
I was a guest on an Internet radio show and I’d been brought in for a political discussion about Donald Trump. One of the hosts is a woman who lives in England and isn’t fond of Trump. The other host is a man in Ohio who’s a big Trump supporter.
As we got started, I first tried to find out why the man supports Trump, so I asked him to outline what he likes about Trump’s performance as president so far. It seemed like a reasonable place to start, but things went downhill from there.
The man has a lot of opinions, but when I tried to narrow down why he believed those things, he frequently had to admit that he didn’t know the facts about the subjects. He was opposed to “illegal immigration,” for instance — and insisted he wasn’t opposed to immigration overall — but he finally admitted he didn’t have any idea how U.S. laws determine who’s allowed to immigrate legally.
On subject after subject today, most modern Americans have opinions which are not based on any reality. This man had firm opinions, but his opinions weighed his mind down so much that facts weren’t necessary. He hadn’t thought through the things he believed — and it seemed to surprise him to have someone pointing this out.
Goodbye, Emily (2009-2015)
In the old Ginger or Mary Ann debate, I wanted a third choice
If you believe watching porn won’t hurt anyone, you’re wrong
Faith is our only assurance that rebirth will come again in spring
Stunningly arrogant Vatican paper demands world economic dictator
What will you do when ‘electing the right people’ doesn’t change things?
Ignorant economic reporting doesn’t help an equally ignorant public
What if repairing my worst flaw meant losing my greatest power?
Trying to force others to be like us destroys loving relationships