I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
We can’t really change people, even if they offer us the control
‘Let’s Make a Deal’: How democracy is like a dumb old game show
Why waste time on Ukraine war? Focus on your own future instead
Does your life feel wasted so far? Maybe your best is yet to come
Does Ron Paul lead in Iowa? Does it matter for the long term if he does?

Public discourse is distorted by constant outrage over anecdotes
I’m paralyzed by fear my choices won’t match needs of future wife
Is this what happens when you teach children there are no absolutes?