There’s something wrong with the “justice” system when a jury convicts a man of a crime, but sends a note to the judge saying, “We’ve all reached a verdict. To us we feel he has been wronged. Please consider that in his sentencing.”
In other words, the jury felt that the accused was actually the victim in the case, but they still did what the judge and prosecutor told them to do. That’s wrong. (They’ve probably never heard of jury nullification, because judges work pretty hard to make sure jurors aren’t aware of their real rights and responsibilities.)
A Texas jury convicted a man of resisting arrest after police mistook him for a burglar and broke into his home — and he tried to escape from them. Police say a neighbor reported — wrongly — seeing a black male kicking in a door to the house. For some odd reason, this Hispanic man apparently didn’t trust that police who had just broken into his own home had his best interests at heart.
The man’s attorney says his client has the mind of a child and also struggles with the English/Spanish language barrier, but I’d say the guy showed good judgement in resisting the people who were breaking in and trying to grab him, whether they were dressed in police costumes or not.
Eviction leaves me sifting through collateral damage of a broken life
Need for love drives behaviors; for me, old needs make me eat
Hiding anger was a survival skill, so you might not know I’m angry
Internet helps blogging 9-year-old change the lousy food at her school
Good character matters far more than winning political arguments
Lens of narcissism is only way to understand Donald Trump’s crime
Don’t believe angry words and deception from a wounded heart
If you knew when you would die, would that affect how you lived?
If you’ve gotten on the wrong bus, nothing changes until you get off