If you care about individual freedom, Russell Brand isn’t a hero. He’s just another ignorant buffoon selling a populist version of socialism.
Brand is a comedian and actor, but he’s now pontificating about politics and economics to a fawning worldwide audience. I’ve seen praise heaped upon him this week by otherwise-reasonable people. Why? Because he conducted a combative interview on a BBC news show in which he attacked the Establishment.
But what does Brand stand for?
“[I advocate] a socialist egalitarian scheme based on the massive redistribution of wealth, heavy taxation of corporations,” Brand said. “The very concept of profit should be reduced. … I say profit is a filthy word because wherever there is profit, there is also deficit.”
Does this sound like someone who knows anything about individual freedom? Does it sound like someone who knows anything about economics? Does it sound like anything other than the same old ignorance that has led much of the world to economic ruin since Karl Marx popularized this nonsense?

If you want life outside of hatred, get away from political cesspool
Does every loss of love finally become a case of ‘sour grapes’?
NOTEBOOK: If results confuse Paul’s aides, how competent are they?
Why do Birmingham taxpayers give $500,000 yearly to college sports?
Those Libyan ‘freedom fighters’ we paid for? They’re murdering thugs
I don’t claim to know the solution, but the modern church has failed
Great men who change the world rarely look impressive from start
Envy drives hatred for wealthy, but I want to earn my riches
Be careful what you hunger for; it’s very often not what you need