In the last 48 hours, Paul Ryan has been crowned the great hope of fiscal conservatives. If they honestly believe that, they’re more desperate than I thought, because the only way to see Ryan as fiscally conservative is to completely ignore his record.
It seems that the presumptive GOP vice presidential nominee is seen as a fiscal conservative simply because of his budget proposal in the House. His proposal would have balanced the budget without raising taxes, but it was an absolute fairy tale of a proposal, partly because it would have required decades of future presidents and Congresses to stick to it as laid out. Is there anybody in the world stupid enough to believe that’s even remotely possible?
Mainstream political reporters are painting the selection of Ryan as a turn to the “radical right” to placate the Tea Party’s supporters. A writer for Time magazine even said that Ryan was the choice of the “libertarians on the Wall Street Journal editorial board….” (I haven’t run into any actual libertarians yet who are excited about Ryan.)

New segregation: Why do some people cling to racial politics?
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Can’t we all get along? Why is the liberty movement so fragmented?
National LP official: ‘It’s gotta be Romney, there is no choice’
Out of touch: Most politicians, media don’t understand ‘the real world’
What if we planted for future instead of spending for today?
‘Tolerant’ left seethes with hate if you don’t accept ‘gender theory’
Before you can rescue other folks, you have to learn to save yourself
False dichotomy: Your choice isn’t coercive state vs. lawlessness