If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

From hole I’ve fallen into today, world is a very alienating place
Pride can drive dumb behaviors, even if subject is just car lights
Love & Hope — Episode 5:
Lens of narcissism is only way to understand Donald Trump’s crime
Little girl’s face and colorful sky have power to pierce my heart
When you make your life choices, you also pick the consequences
Lesson of ‘judgment day’ error? Certainty doesn’t indicate truth
NOTEBOOK: Are Romney, Obama running for president or king?
Police won’t do their job, but they’ll ticket you for doing it for them