I spent much of my weekend showing houses to buyers. Every time I do this, it’s always the same experience for me. I wonder why anybody with the slightest understanding of aesthetics would have built such houses — and why anybody would buy them.
I’m in the minority on this, of course, because almost everybody buys whatever is popular among his friends and family. They don’t know any better. They buy what they know. They buy what seems “normal” to them. So they buy houses which are painfully garish or pretentious or dull to me. And builders keep building those sorts of houses — simply because that’s what people expect to buy.
When I’m showing such a house — and people are talking about borrowing half a million dollars to buy it — I want to ask them if this is what they really want. I want to ask them if they’ve ever considered the warmly beautiful piece of living art they could build for that money instead. I want to show them houses such as this one on the market right now in Redlands, Calif.
But I don’t — because I remember how ignorant I was about design philosophy before I finally learned to appreciate good architecture, too. They wouldn’t appreciate my suggestion any more than I would have appreciated it back when I wanted something which I would loathe today.

‘Run away with me?’ I couldn’t accept her offer, but I wanted to
Deputies too busy to work accidents, but have time to raid bingo halls
Both sides of gun debate see what they want to see in D.C. shooting
Mark Bodenhausen was a principled libertarian, but he was an even better human being
Identity politics is the cancer behind Elizabeth Warren’s lie about ancestry
I need a romantic partner who’s already facing her inner demons
Financial crisis seems serious when it hits your own neighbors
Ban on saggy pants: Why do we require laws against looking foolish?