I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

When governments keep secrets, you’re probably being lied to
Does this look like a child abuser? Voters must not have thought so
Worshiping the ‘lesser evil’ will always allow evil to rule over you
When strangers tell us things we want to hear, we want to believe
We never get enough of whatever lets us feel safe being ourselves
Who’s afraid of a federal shutdown? Many of us hope for the real thing
Door in my dream keeps trying to take me to the life I’ve needed
Odd interest in UK’s royal family suggests remnant of need for ruler
Despite advantages to digital books, there’s still nothing like ‘real’ books