David McElroy

William was named for William the Conqueror, and he’s always done his best to live up to his dominant name. As a kitten, he was domineering and as an adult, he’s usually the one who the others quietly defer to. I guess he’s about 12 years old now, but I don’t recall exactly. He’s still confident and curious, and he’s determined to eventually figure out why I hold my iPhone up to him like this so frequently. This picture is from earlier this week. If you missed it before, here’s William’s story.

Much to my surprise, people sometimes send me email to ask who I support for the Republican presidential nomination. I can only assume those people don’t read the site thoroughly, but I’m going to make an endorsement today — just for them.

What is it we want in a president? We want a person who will respect individual liberty across the board, someone who will end government intervention in the economy, someone who will pull U.S. troops back to our own states and use them only to defend that territory, and someone who will dismantle the social welfare state that has been built for the last 80 years or so. There are other details we want, but those are some broad strokes.

Taking the requirements of the job into account, I’m throwing my complete support behind that great, patriotic American named Mr. Nobody. That’s right. Without question, Nobody gets my endorsement.

Since Congress controls the laws that decide how much individual freedom we’re allowed to keep, the other candidates won’t respect our freedom. They can’t. They don’t make the laws. Nobody will respect our freedom.

Because Congress mandates that the executive branch control more and more aspects of our personal lives, the president isn’t allowed to decide to let the economy operate on its own. Obama can’t do that. Romney can’t do that. Not even Ron Paul can do that. Nobody can.

Keep Reading

During the administration of George W. Bush, the political left was rightfully indignant about no-bid contracts going to administration allies. The poster child for such corruption was Halliburton. Now that it’s clear that the administration of Barack Obama is doing the same thing, are we going to see the same protests? Or will those on the left look the other way?

The Los Angeles Times has an excellent story this weekend detailing how the Obama administration is handing a no-bid contract to a company controlled by a major Democratic Party donor. The contract is for a smallpox drug that hasn’t been tested on humans and which experts say isn’t even necessary.

When the company complained that the Department of Health and Human Services was resisting paying what it wanted to charge, senior Obama administration officials removed the government’s lead negotiator from the deal. Doesn’t this sound like serious political corruption to you?

The point here isn’t that Democrats are corrupt or that all Republicans aren’t. The point is that the system has incentives that lead to anyone in power doing the same things. Some Republicans end up doing it when they have power. Some Democrats end up doing it when they have power. And here’s the thing that’s hard for some people to understand. If we elected a libertarian government (or a socialist government or a communitarian government or any other kind you can think of), it would happen anyway.

Keep Reading