Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

It’s wrong to silence anybody, even a nutcase like Alex Jones
Is Paul Krugman serious or is this some kind of weird performance art?
How miserable does someone have to be to ‘troll’ a cute dog picture?
I was a terrible preacher, because cookie-cutter truth seemed empty
A year later, late-night phone call and suicide threat still echo in me
Regain your sanity by focusing only on things you can control
Smart people will flee big cities before death, disease take over
We frequently go back to the past hoping to find a different future
How does modern culture escape ‘little boxes made of ticky tacky’?