I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
How do we intuitively see truth through the fog of perception?
The plan sounded fair at the time, but why did I pay for everything?
Without peaceful breakup plan, U.S. faces violent, angry collapse
Step in the right direction: U.S. ad group bans cosmetic photoshopping
Anonymous ‘Santas’ secretly paying for families’ Christmas layaways

Patterns that made old mistakes keep us making same old errors
We can see injustices of the past, but still honor men who achieved