Let me introduce you to someone important in my life.
Her name is Claire.
She is calm, intelligent, reflective, warm without being loud, serious without being severe. She has an easy smile and the sort of presence that suggests both kindness and backbone. She seems like someone who reads books thoughtfully, listens carefully and notices things most people rush past.
There’s just one complication.
Claire is not real.
She isn’t a woman I met, dated or nearly married. She’s not waiting somewhere for our paths to cross at a dinner party or a bookstore or one of those improbably meaningful moments movies have taught us to expect.
Claire is a hypothesis.
A few days ago, I engaged in an unusual exercise: describing, with surprising precision, the kind of woman who would most likely be deeply compatible with me. Not a fantasy assembled from wishful thinking, but a probabilistic sketch shaped by temperament, values and the realities of long-term partnership.
The result was Claire.

Urban Meyer’s drunken behavior points to deeper character issues
Changes are destroying culture, but we can build beautiful dream
To unlock your heart for real love, you must embrace vulnerability
Lack of ability to think plays a role in public acceptance of higher taxes
All sides rushing to assign blame in theater shootings only leads to error
Check out my Tuesday interview on Steve Gelder’s political radio show
I want the culture to value smart women more than ‘hot’ women
Christmas tree ‘promotion fee’ is just another hidden tax on consumers