I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
France’s new Socialist president wants same things Obama does
Trust and spontaneous order don’t require heavy hand of the state
Some of us feel rage at authority, even as disobedience can hurt us
I can’t help wanting to replay life with emotionally healthy parents
NOTEBOOK: Why do so many libertarians need One True Way?
New year is great time to resolve to cut toxic folks out of your life

Humans are impatient, but changes in Alabama show speed of change
Reality no longer seems to matter to dysfunctional culture in denial
We can’t have real freedom without also allowing discrimination