Let me introduce you to someone important in my life.
Her name is Claire.
She is calm, intelligent, reflective, warm without being loud, serious without being severe. She has an easy smile and the sort of presence that suggests both kindness and backbone. She seems like someone who reads books thoughtfully, listens carefully and notices things most people rush past.
There’s just one complication.
Claire is not real.
She isn’t a woman I met, dated or nearly married. She’s not waiting somewhere for our paths to cross at a dinner party or a bookstore or one of those improbably meaningful moments movies have taught us to expect.
Claire is a hypothesis.
A few days ago, I engaged in an unusual exercise: describing, with surprising precision, the kind of woman who would most likely be deeply compatible with me. Not a fantasy assembled from wishful thinking, but a probabilistic sketch shaped by temperament, values and the realities of long-term partnership.
The result was Claire.

Memory Lane is seductive when
If an election can destroy your life, your priorities are out of whack
The hole is always there, but I foolishly hope it’ll just go away
Who ‘owns’ children? And who should step in when parents fail?
What’s the difference between a cop and an actual peace officer?
Replacing Obama with a Republican president won’t change anything
In other news, donations keep pouring in to feed the monkeys
Tuesday’s Senate vote reminds me of German ‘Enabling Act’ of 1933