Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

Would getting away from civilization help us live better?
Lesson from U2: Rejection doesn’t necessarily mean it’s time to give up
Smart people will flee big cities before death, disease take over
Want to return to a simpler world? Say ‘goodbye’ to cheeseburgers
How do we often know things which we shouldn’t really know?
AUDIO: Without mastering ideas, we’re all blind leading the blind
Vile human cost of war ignored by Americans playing political games
‘Self government’ means you govern yourself, not obey your neighbors
If majority rule is such a great idea, why don’t we vote on toothpaste?