Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

Top secret weapon for homeland security: the ‘Sno-Cone’ machine
Will rising anger about personal economic pain lead to trouble soon?
If people say I intimidate them, what am I really doing wrong?
Sudden realization of hunger for taste of kindred soul is killing me
A reminder to friends of liberty: Others don’t understand our beliefs
Loving father’s pride in daughter easily bridges our language gap
Christmas stands for quiet truths: love, faith, community and family
After years of silence, it’s time to tell the truth about my father