Everybody knows “net neutrality” is a great idea. Right?
Ask any self-respecting member of the digerati and you’ll get the same response. We need net neutrality to “save our Internet.” That’s what all their slogans say, so it must be true.
But do you know what the real issues are? Do the people leading the pro-net neutrality crusades even understand what they’re advocating? Or are they just going along with what seems like a good idea since it’s aimed at big companies they don’t like?
There are few issues today which are as dishonestly framed as “net neutrality.” Although I like many of the outcomes which its advocates favor, the idea is a massive intrusion on private property — and it sets up government to control the Internet.
Briefly, the idea of net neutrality is that any Internet provider must treat every packet of data coming through the network equally. The provider isn’t allowed to charge more or less for one type of data — video or traffic coming from one particular site, for instance. An Internet service provider isn’t allowed to have plans that give a user all the data he wants from one company but have metered access (or no access) for data coming from a different company.

Goodbye, Merlin (2003-2022)
Why do tax dollars fund lavish lifestyles for bureaucrats?
There’s a lot to complain about, but miracle is so much goes right
What did you want in childhood? Did you abandon those dreams?
Can I talk myself into not wanting great things I fear I’ll never have?
Financial ignorance from your TV: Gold may not be around next year
Ron Paul asks 31 tough questions that our politicians won’t answer
You can change your story, but you first must throw away the old ones
Obsession with partisan hatred diverts you from economic truth