Everybody knows “net neutrality” is a great idea. Right?
Ask any self-respecting member of the digerati and you’ll get the same response. We need net neutrality to “save our Internet.” That’s what all their slogans say, so it must be true.
But do you know what the real issues are? Do the people leading the pro-net neutrality crusades even understand what they’re advocating? Or are they just going along with what seems like a good idea since it’s aimed at big companies they don’t like?
There are few issues today which are as dishonestly framed as “net neutrality.” Although I like many of the outcomes which its advocates favor, the idea is a massive intrusion on private property — and it sets up government to control the Internet.
Briefly, the idea of net neutrality is that any Internet provider must treat every packet of data coming through the network equally. The provider isn’t allowed to charge more or less for one type of data — video or traffic coming from one particular site, for instance. An Internet service provider isn’t allowed to have plans that give a user all the data he wants from one company but have metered access (or no access) for data coming from a different company.

Her dad didn’t want to help her, so here’s a jack-o’-lantern for Hannah
When doubt wakes me at dawn, my world seems a lonely place
Ghost of Richard M. Nixon haunts Obama administration’s IRS fiasco
Tell me the music you listen to and that’ll reveal a lot about you
Egypt trying to prove democracy means tyranny of the majority
Identity crisis might lead to integration of my inner selves
Don’t show me the past or the future; show me what you can give now
I want the culture to value smart women more than ‘hot’ women
Just $12 fed mom and her girls, but bigger challenges lie ahead