We’re frequently told that we must support foreign invasions and military operations in other countries because that means “supporting the troops.” A veteran of the military gave me his thoughts on this whole idea on Memorial Day.
Those who support invading other countries and continuing wars that can’t be won tell us that doing so honors and supports the men and women who are fighting the wars. If that’s true, why did 87 percent of contributions from active-duty U.S. military people to GOP candidates go to Ron Paul — the only candidate who supports an end to military adventurism, reserving the U.S. military to the role of defending this country rather than invading other countries that haven’t attacked us?
More of those in the armed services have grave reservations about the way the military is used today. Some might be blindly supportive of the militaristic view of their civilian bosses, but a substantial number know better. And as many of them finish their time in the military and reflect on what they’ve seen and heard, they come to view things in very different ways. This is what a veteran said to me Monday in discussing the illustration above:

My reaction to man’s home taught me more about me than about him
VIDEO: Dangerous ideas are the ones that change world for good
Gay marriage debate turns into fight for validation of private beliefs
The Alien Observer: Craving predictability in a world gone mad
Kitten outsmarted me for weeks, but Alex finally joined our family
After 15 years and 2,500 articles, I’ve added guide for new readers
Pearl Harbor: Simple sneak attack or culmination of FDR’s plan for war?
Political action may seize power, but only ideas bring real change