Petty politics as usual just might be Chris Christie’s bridge to obscurity

By David McElroy · January 9, 2014

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is outraged that his minions closed lanes on the George Washington Bridge in order to cause problems in the city of one of his political enemies. That’s what he’s saying right now, and we all know that a politician wouldn’t lie.

I’d like to remind you that this is nothing but politics as usual. Whether Christie knew about it or not — and I’m betting he did — this is just the way the game of politics is played.

Christie is facing political heat because of disclosure by the Bergen Record that his underlings — including a man who went to high school with him — participated in a plan to cause traffic problems for Fort Lee, N.J., purely because of political differences with the city’s mayor. The newspaper obtained a cache of emails and text messages exchanged between the various people involved in the plan.

On Aug. 13, Bridget Anne Kelly, who is one of three deputy chiefs of staff for Christie, sent an email to David Wildstein, who is considered Christie’s “eyes and ears at the Port Authority.” In that message, Kelly said, “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.” Wildstein clearly understood the message, as he simply responded with, “Got it.” Wildstein is a longtime political operative in New Jersey and went to high school with Christie.

On a subsequent morning, the Port Authority closed certain lanes on the George Washington Bridge without announcement or explanation during morning rush-hour for four days.

In a text message, Wildstein mentioned that Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich had been leaving messages complaining about school buses having trouble getting through. The unidentified person who responded to that text message wrote, “Is it wrong that I’m smiling?” To which Wildstein replied, “No.”

The other person responded to say, “I feel badly about the kids. I guess.” Wildstein reminded the other person what truly matters in politics: “They are the children of Buono voters,” he said, referring to Democrat Barbara Buono, who was running against Christie for governor at the time.

You can read many more details if you’re interested in the story, but the details aren’t really the point to me. It’s certainly a terrible and petty thing for Christie’s staffers to do. (And although it’s possible she would have died anyway, a Fort Lee woman died while waiting for medical help that was delayed by the closing, so that blood might even be on their hands.)

As you hear more about the story, the focus is going to be about whether this is going to derail Christie’s political ambitions. Some people will rush to say that this is typical of Christie, while Christie and his team will make the case that he knew nothing about it and is outraged. It’s going to be turned into political theater by people who are jockeying for position in the 2016 GOP presidential primaries.

The underlying assumption, though, is that this was some anomaly. The question on the minds of people will be whether to blame Christie for this obviously rare example of overzealous politicization of government services.

But if there’s anyone who doesn’t believe that this is typical — by politicians of both parties — in places all over the country, I’ll be happy to sell you the George Washington Bridge.

Anyone who doesn’t already assume that politicians punish cities and communities for supporting the “wrong” party or candidate is very naive. Politicians pay off to their constituents and ignore (or punish) their opponents’ constituents all the time. The only surprising thing about this case is that these folks were stupid enough to put it into writing in a way it could be proven at a later date.

Government doesn’t work the way you were taught in civics class. We don’t have battles of ideas in which informed voters choose between benevolent candidates to see who will win office for the privilege of sacrificing his talents by spending time in office in order to serve the public.

Politicians are after money and power. They will use any means at their disposal to fight the enemy. If you think the fighting between Bloods and Crips is intense, you don’t know what it’s like between Team Red and Team Blue.

There really are some people who are in politics for the “right reasons,” at least as defined by the civics class fairy tale. But even those who are in the game for the right reason can tend to let their competitive natures overtake them, to the point that they’re willing to do anything to win.

Not everyone in politics is like that. But there are enough of them that very ugly things happen on a regular basis. I know because I’ve been part of some of them on a very small scale.

The real point here has nothing to do with whether Christie knew about this or whether it hurts his chances for the 2016 GOP nomination. The real point is that we have a messed-up political system that gives power to narcissistic children, who then abuse the people they’re supposed to be serving.

The system is corrupt and broken. The fault lies at the very heart of how a majoritarian political system works. The solution isn’t ending Christie’s career or firing some of his aides.

The answer is getting rid of the state — which spawns the corruption and evil because of the incentive involved. Focusing on Christie with the belief that this is unusual is incredibly naive.

The system is broken. The coercive state needs to die.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts