In a relationship, some words even more important than ‘I love you’

By David McElroy · January 20, 2018

“I just wish he would say, ‘I love you,’ more often,” the woman confided to her friend. “Is that too much to ask?”

I was listening to a couple of women talk about the problems one of them has in her marriage. They were sitting at a table next to me at dinner Saturday night. They weren’t very loud, so I didn’t get all the details, but I was struck very strongly by the fact that the troubled woman seemed to believe her life would be so much better if her husband just said those three little words more often.

We’ve been conditioned by our culture to think that words of love will make everything all right. The Beatles told us that “love is all you need” and many people believed them, because it feels so good to think that. Popular culture is full of this notion. If you say, “I love you,” and you mean it, everything will be great. (Cue romantic music and happy ending.)

But as I thought about the conversation I heard, I kept thinking the unhappy woman is almost certainly confusing herself. Saying “I love you” is a great start, but it’s never enough. If you don’t say and do other things that give the words meaning, then those three words will be empty at best and selfish at worst.

So if it’s not enough to just say, “I love you,” what sorts of things do we need to say? And what do we need to hear? Here are a few that occur to me. Your list might vary, because your emotional needs — and the emotional needs of your partner — might be different.

• “I need you.” There’s an odd idea floating around in pop culture that it’s unhealthy to need the person who loves you, but this is nonsense. If you love someone and that person loves you in return, there are few things as wonderful as being needed — when it’s mutual. Yes, there can be unhealthy relationships of need — typically very imbalanced — but mutual dependence can be a great thing. So tell the person you love why you need him or her. He or she needs to know.

• “I like you.” Love can start in mysterious ways and it can be a trickster. You might develop feelings for someone based on physical attraction or convenience or dozens of other things. Many of those feelings won’t survive over time. You’ll change what you feel as your needs change and as you get accustomed to being with someone all the time. So you need to like someone, too. That’s the sort of thing that’s less likely to change. If you truly like your partner, you need to say so — and you need to explain what you like about him or her.

• “You are beautiful to me, but that’s not why I love you.” Everybody wants to feel attractive, but nobody wants to believe that a love relationship is based on perfect looks. It’s great to find your partner beautiful, but that will change over time. We age. We gain weight. We physically change in a lot of ways. If your partner believes his or her love for you is based around physical appearance, you’re setting that person up for insecurity. If someone believes he or she is valued for beauty or sex, for instance, that person is going to be paranoid about failing to live up to an impossible standard.

• “I’ll take a chance on you if you take a chance on me.” No relationship is guaranteed. There’s no such thing as a perfect future. Love can end. People can change. As much as we want to believe love will last forever and relationships can be for a lifetime, that’s not always true. If you love someone and that person loves you, you need to make it clear that you know the future isn’t guaranteed and you know things could fall apart — but that you’re completely committed to taking a chance if the other person will do the same. Love relationships require a tremendous amount of faith. It’s important for your partner to know you accept him or her on faith.

• “This matters more to you than it does to me, so let’s do what you prefer.” Some people try to get their way all the time in relationships. Those people manipulate and scheme. They see their relationship as a contest of wills, not as a partnership. The truth is that there will be times when two partners want different things. Most of the time when there is disagreement, one or the other will feel more strongly about the matter. Be conscious of this and quit trying to get your way all the time. Tell your partner — as often as possible — that you’re willing to concede, not because you think you’re wrong, but simply because this case doesn’t matter as much to you. In the right kind of relationship, two people can almost compete to see who can please the other more about such things. It’s not weakness to give in. It can be strength.

• “What can I do to make your life better right now?” Everybody has problems in his or her life. With the way most couples live their lives today — going in completely different directions and not crossing paths all the time — it’s easy to lose track of the “pain points” in your partner’s life. You need to be willing to jump in to provide help whenever your partner needs it. And even if you don’t know about an issue, there are times when it’s valuable to ask — as often as you can — what you can do for your partner. Even if he or she doesn’t need help at the moment, your willingness expresses real love in an important way.

• “I choose you every day. If I met you now, I would choose you again.” We don’t make one relationship decision and that one decision lasts for life. You decide every single day whether you love your partner and whether you’re happy with the life you have together. We all know that, whether we admit it out loud or not. It’s easy to eventually fear that someone is bored with you. It can strengthen a relationship to let a partner know that you are still consciously choosing him or her every day — and that you would choose him or her all over again if you just met today.

• “You are my priority.” Your partner needs to know that you put him or her above other things in your life. Your partner needs to know that you will be there when he or she needs help. Your partner needs to know he or she matters more than your friends or your job or your other daily priorities. Your partner needs to know that he or she can depend on you in times of need.

• “Whatever’s wrong, we can work it out; I won’t give up on us.” Every relationship will have problems, so it’s easy to become insecure about your future together. This isn’t the same as saying, “You can’t leave me. You’re stuck with me for life.” That’s entirely different. This is a pledge to actively work through inevitable issues. It’s a commitment to doing whatever is necessary for both of you to be happy — so it’s actually the opposite of just saying, “You’re stuck with me.”

• “You’ve been on my mind today, even more than usual. I can’t take my mind off of you.” When you’re apart from someone, it’s easy for that person to wonder whether you really think about him or her. For me, I constantly think about someone I love and constantly have the desire to pick up a phone and say, “You’re on my mind. I can’t stop thinking about you, because I love you.” We all need to believe a partner cares that much about us. We all need to know we have the sort of relationship that means we’re on someone’s mind even if we’re not there. When you feel that pang of longing for a missing person, say so. It can change your partner’s day to know you’re thinking of him or her.

Those are just a few of the phrases that are important to express. Saying “I love you” is great. It can be meaningful. But if it’s not backed up with other words and actions, those three little words will quickly become meaningless even if they’re said.

Think about what you want to hear. Think about what your partner actually needs. (His or her “love language” might be different from yours, so think in terms of what your partner needs, not what you need.)

Love is an amazing journey, but “I love you” is never enough to get a relationship to where it needs to go. There are plenty of other things we need to say and do. Make a conscious decision to talk about the things that need to be talked about. Take the lead. You might be amazed at how much your vulnerability and willingness to start can be worth.

There’s nothing in the world more powerful than the right kind of love. Don’t take it for granted when you are loved and when you love someone else. Nurture it. Work at it. That’s the only way to make love last.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts