Old documents force me to rethink things I’ve believed about my father

By David McElroy · July 7, 2018

When I was a little boy, I thought both of my parents were brilliant. Does everyone assume that of his own parents? Or was that just me?

Both of my parents had college degrees and both had started their careers as teachers. (Mother spent her entire career teaching.) They both seemed to know everything — at least compared to me — so I guess I thought they had been good students, especially because they expected me to do well at everything in school.

I figured out a long time ago that my mother had been both more creative and more academically gifted than he was. My father wasn’t stupid — and his head was actually stuffed with an impressive array of facts — but he wasn’t brilliant.

As I went through some of his remaining things to throw away today, I came across his college transcript — and I was shocked. He was a terrible student, far worse than I had imagined.

He somehow received a degree — a major in history and a minor in English — but his transcript was riddled with grades of D and even F. He made an A in only three classes for his entire college career, which was a far cry from what I had assumed of him.

It doesn’t seem like a big deal, but things such as this continue to force me to re-evaluate what I’ve believed about him — both lately and in the distant past.

Why did he lead me to believe he had been a good student? Was the deception intentional — or had I simply believed what I wanted to believe about him? I’ll never know.

I also realized recently that I have his senior yearbook from high school. He was a spring graduate from Woodlawn High School in Birmingham in 1948. Most of the students seem to be smiling in their photos, to one degree or another.

My father’s face is a blank.

Almost all of the other students had provided information about themselves — nicknames, class activities, ambitions, etc. My father provided nothing. Others had six or eight lines of copy. My father’s simply read, “Edward McElroy.”

Am I reading too much into his picture to think he looks like an unhappy young man? I don’t know.

I do know that his father had periodic drinking problems and regularly cheated on my grandmother. That was hidden from us while we were young, but I eventually heard some ugly stories. What was it in his childhood that programmed my father for narcissism? He would admit to having had a terrible childhood — constantly moving because of financial problems — but he never would give me many details.

I found other papers today which rewrite some of what I have believed about my childhood. I thought my parents divorced when I was 9, but it was more complicated. I found two sets of signed divorces between them. The first was a divorce case filed in Atlanta when I was about 7. It was signed and witnessed by both of them. Why was it never official? I have no idea.

Their second set of divorce papers were filed in Anniston, Ala., when I was 11. Their entire relationship for that period of four or five years was so stormy that it’s impossible for me to know now what happened.

It was in that period — when I was about 9 or 10 — when Mother would come see us on weekends while she taught school and lived an hour away. They fought all the time and we hated the conflict. We would have to get up very early on Monday mornings during that period to drive Mother to the Greyhound bus station so she could be back in time for her school day.

I’ll never forget leaving the bus station one morning in our Volkswagen Beetle — still sleepy from being up so early — and my father goading us into singing, “Thank God and Greyhound,” on our way home. He thought it was funny and he pressured us into singing these words of a popular song with him:

Thank God and Greyhound you’re gone
That load on my mind got lighter when you got on
That shiny old bus is a beautiful sight
With the black smoke a rolling up around the taillights
It may sound kinda cruel but I’ve been silent too long
Thank God and Greyhound you’re gone

I was numb to how I felt at the time, but even as an emotionally numb child, it felt wrong to be singing this about my mother. It made my father feel good to think his children were on his side as the two of them battled over everything in the world.

There were other things I found today. There was his second divorce from 1990. His Army discharge papers. A letter he sent to one of my sisters a few years ago which was returned to him because he didn’t have her current address.

There was also a handwritten letter to him from my mother about 14 years ago. In the letter, she explained to him that she had been diagnosed with Alzheimers and was starting to have more issues. There was no hint of having been sorry to have lost him, but the letter was gracious and warm.

Without saying so, it sounded like a letter to say goodbye since she knew she was going to lose her ability to remember things. She said she was glad that they had been able to have some good times together, but she didn’t mention any of the terrible things which I know she held against him.

And it made me realize one key difference between my parents.

Everything my father did was ultimately about himself, even when he appeared to be doing something for someone else. There was always an ulterior motive. He was so driven by fear of not being loved and of being abandoned. (I can identify with those fears.) He was always trying to manipulate everyone to think well of him.

My mother genuinely cared about other people. Although she wrote to give him news of herself, she obviously had no motive. She was caring and kind and gracious to the man who had abused her for so many years.

When I was younger, I wanted to be more like him than like her. At this point, I don’t really want to be like either of them overall. I just want to be myself.

But when I think about the quality of people they were, there was far more to respect and emulate in my mother. My father’s demons had too much control of his will for there to be much worth emulating in him.

I hope I can keep learning from what both of them were — as I continue to re-evaluate them — so I can continue the long journey of becoming the kind of man I want to be.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts