• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

David McElroy

making sense of a dysfunctional culture

  • About David
  • New here?
  • DavidMcElroy.TV

Forced sterilization gets to heart of arrogant progressive agenda

By David McElroy · January 12, 2012

The progressive Left has always seen itself as the high-minded reformers of the world. They’ve always been the moralists who stood for what was right. Those who opposed them were seen as evil and selfish. So why do they ignore the evil in their own roots?

When we talk about eugenics and forced sterilization to control the purity of a country’s people, our thoughts turn to Nazi Germany. But how many Americans understand that the progressives had been successful in getting eugenics laws passed in more than half the states — before the Nazis ever even came to power? What’s even worse is that the Nazis seem to have gotten the idea from Americans.

All of this comes up this week because a state panel in North Carolina has just recommended paying compensation of $50,000 each to people who were sterilized against their will. I find it interesting that none of the news stories seem to be mentioning that it was the progressive Left behind these programs starting in the early 20th century. I don’t think it’s an intentional omission. I just think it’s a part of history that the progressives have buried deeply — and few understand how deeply something such as forced sterilization is emblematic of what progressives really stand for.

The early 20th century narrative for this country — especially for southern states — is all about race. In fact, the reporter who wrote the story for the Los Angeles Times about the North Carolina compensation seemed surprised to find out that most of the people sterilized were white instead of black:

Impoverished or uneducated African Americans were victimized by many eugenics programs, especially in the South. But the task force found that, although many victims of the North Carolina program were African Americans, the number of Caucasians who were sterilized was even higher.

A version of an Associated Press story Monday implied so strongly that the motivation was racial that the AP was forced to issue a “clarification” to point out that only 40 percent of the victims were black. There was a tremendous amount of racism — especially in the South — but eugenics was a reformist program of the progressive movement — to rid us of crime and other socially undesirable things, such as “feeble-minded” people.

In 1960, the Wisconsin Magazine of History even had an article that discussed what about eugenics attracted the progressives. It’s kind of hard to blame southern racists for Wisconsin’s eugenics law, isn’t it? (Click on this graphic for a larger version showing which states had adopted “eugenics sterilization laws” by 1913. They cluster in the areas where progressives were strong — the Northeast, the Midwest and on the West Coast — not the South.)

Although progressives don’t like to claim eugenics now — and they also don’t like to claim Prohibition, which they also were responsible for — we can easily see that eugenics and Prohibition were natural outgrowths of what they preached.

The core idea of the progressives is that they know what’s best for other people. They know what’s right for everyone else. They know what contracts people should be allowed to enter into. They know what should be done with other people’s money. They even know who should be allowed to reproduce. (And, yes, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was a progressive who believed fully in eugenics — and saw her organization as preventing “the wrong kinds” from reproducing. See here and here if you’d like to explore more about what that monster believed.)

Today’s progressives still believe basically the same things. They still believe they know what’s best for everyone, so they insist on passing laws to control people’s lives. And the worst part is that we don’t have progressives on one side and those standing for freedom on the other in this country. Instead, the Democratic and Republican parties are progressive and progressive-lite, respectively. They just have slightly different ideas about what to control about your life.

The same intellectual thinking that led to forced sterilization has led to the web of control that has been created around us. The laws that control us are supposed to be for our own good, but they control us nonetheless.

The progressives of an earlier time had no moral right to decide who was to be allowed to reproduce and who was not. They had no right to force alcohol Prohibition on us. But modern progressives likewise have no moral right to control us today. I believe the day will come that the involuntary, authoritarian “safety net” of control around us will be seen as just as barbaric as we see eugenics as having been.

What the progressives did in the past was monstrously evil, but the coercion they use to control our lives today is no less evil. If you find yourself supporting a politician demanding moral controls on other people, remember that you’re supporting something that’s no more moral than forcing sterilization on “undesirables” of the past. It’s terribly immoral, then and now.

Note: If you’d like to read more about forced sterilization in the United States, see this website for a book called “Better for All the World,” which deals with the subject. You’ll find the three pages of description an interesting introduction to the subject.

Share on Social Networks

Related Posts

  • Since I’ve lost status I once had, it’s a shock to see I want it backSince I’ve lost status I once had, it’s a shock to see I want it back
  • Real-life ‘ghost story’: The tale of a house that didn’t want me there
  • This must be what it’s like to talk to people who believe earth is flat

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

The lights and color might have been more spectacu The lights and color might have been more spectacular a couple of minutes before this, but this was the best view I had of the Monday afternoon sunset from a bridge over I-20 in Moody, Ala.
I just remembered this shot I got a couple of hour I just remembered this shot I got a couple of hours ago of the fading sunset while I was in the Publix parking lot on the way home. If you suddenly find yourself craving Arby’s or Wendy’s, blame the giant icons in the sky, not me. 😃 (BTW, this was with the iPhone’s 8X telephoto lens.) #nature #naturephotography #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I had just pulled into a parking lot Friday night I had just pulled into a parking lot Friday night and was watching traffic through the distortion of the gently falling rain on my car window when I realized that the abstract view I had matched the way I was feeling tonight, so I turned it into a brief abstract video to match my mood.
Get ready for the next great animated Christmas cl Get ready for the next great animated Christmas classic, featuring singing and dancing and danger from Alex, Oliver and Sam. Coming soon to a theater near you. (The funniest part is that if I cared about this as anything more than a Christmas joke, it strikes me as something that could be profitable with the right story development and the right animators.)
Here are a couple of views of the sunset I just wa Here are a couple of views of the sunset I just watched on my way home after showing houses. I didn’t have my camera with me, so these are just iPhone shots. #nature #naturephotography #sunset #birmingham #alabama
This is what it might look like if the cats and I This is what it might look like if the cats and I were cast in a Wes Anderson film.
This is one of the funniest things that ChatGPT ha This is one of the funniest things that ChatGPT has done for me. I asked it to create a movie poster showing what a movie poster would look like for a film starring me. I told it to use my previous writings (from my website) to come up with a title and subject matter. And this is what it came up with. I can’t stop laughing. Also, the software decided on its own to included Oliver. 😺
I just noticed in the past couple of days that the I just noticed in the past couple of days that there’s suddenly far more color in the leaves of the trees, which lets me know that winter isn’t far behind. I took these two photos on a chilly Sunday afternoon nine years ago this week. #nature #naturephotography #colorful #trees #autumn #birmingham #alabama
Some of you might be aware that my dog Lucy died o Some of you might be aware that my dog Lucy died of cancer last weekend. As I’ve been grieving the loss of this beautiful and loving girl, I put together a one-minute compilation of short videos of Lucy from her first two or three weeks with me in early 2016. She was several years old at the time, but living with me provided her first stable home. She was unsure of herself at first, but she quickly developed confidence as she discovered how much she was loved. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Critter Instagram

From the CritterCam: The cats seem to be taking tu From the CritterCam: The cats seem to be taking turns on the heated pad tonight. I checked the camera three times in about 10 minutes and found Alex there to start, followed by Sam and then finally Oliver. Maybe they’re rationing time on the pad.
Alex has a busy work schedule today. He doesn’t kn Alex has a busy work schedule today. He doesn’t know how he’s possibly going to get all of his napping done. He has a tough life. 😸
Sam and I are watching the rain outside an office Sam and I are watching the rain outside an office window just after midnight Thursday night. He looks bored, though. 😺
From the CritterCam: Alex seems to think I‘ll come From the CritterCam: Alex seems to think I‘ll come home sooner if he stares at the camera.
The first minute of this is nothing but mutual gro The first minute of this is nothing but mutual grooming for Alex and Oliver, but they both seemed to remember toward the end that fighting is fun, too. After Alex ran off, Oliver took over the chair for himself.
Oliver really seems to be enjoying this basketball Oliver really seems to be enjoying this basketball game so far.
If I were to ever lose weight, I might not be soft If I were to ever lose weight, I might not be soft and squishy enough to be Oliver’s giant pillow. 😸
When I get home in the evenings, the neighbors’ ca When I get home in the evenings, the neighbors’ cat, Pepper, is often there to greet me as soon as I open my car door.
As I left the house for the afternoon after lunch, As I left the house for the afternoon after lunch, Alex was barely awake. He was on top of the castle watching the view out of an office window, but he looks as though he’s going to be asleep very soon.
Follow on Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Search

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)




Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

I have no use for the theocratic and repressive government of Iran. The people who run the country are cruel at best and evil at worst. The Iranian people deserve freedom. But I have no personal quarrel with anybody in Iran. While I’m not thrilled about a future Iranian government having nuclear weapons, I’m just as concerned about nukes in the hands of politicians in Israel, Pakistan, India, China and Russia. I’m not even thrilled with the U.S., Britain and France having them, either, because I don’t trust any politicians to be responsible with such terrible weapons. All I can say with certainty is that American taxpayers have no business attacking Iran, especially since we’re being forced to pay for this attack in order to benefit the politicians of Israel — and nobody else. If Middle Eastern countries want to fight among themselves, that’s none of my business. It’s not the business of the U.S. government, either. I have no quarrel with anybody in Iran — and having the government which claims to represent me launch an unprovoked attack against a sovereign country will only make all Americans less safe in the near future. This attack is poorly conceived and morally unjustified. Remember that when the Iranians launch attacks that we will then condemn as “terrorism.” What the U.S. is doing right now looks like terrorism to me. And let’s not forget that the attack is the latest in a long line of unconstitutional wars by various U.S. presidents — who have no legal power to declare war on their own, according to the U.S. Constitution.

A child having a tantrum understands only one thing: Did I get my way or not? He doesn’t understand the issues involved. He doesn’t understand the reasons that went into a decision. He doesn’t understand any of the things that mature and reasonable adults have to understand in order to live healthy lives. By his reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down his disastrous tariff scheme, Donald Trump shows himself to be — once more — a screaming child having a tantrum. Outside the world of mob bosses who expect to get their way every time, normal adults don’t act this way, but Trump isn’t normal. He’s an angry and vengeful man who has narcissistic personality disorder. And we are in danger as a result. Trump doesn’t understand the legal issues involved in this ruling. He doesn’t understand economics. He doesn’t understand rule of law. He doesn’t understand that he can ever be wrong. All he understands is that he didn’t get his way. And he is now a narcissistic and raging little boy who also happens to hold life-and-death power over most humans on this planet. He’s dangerous — and the system which gives him that power is even more dangerous.

Is it an attempt to blur the gender line between men and women? Or is it some weird tribute to the traditional Scottish kilt? It’s hard to say, but fashion designers keep pushing for men to wear skirts in the last few years. Both men and women in modern fashion seem oddly androgynous, as though it would be offensive for a man to look manly or for a woman to look feminine. A CNN article about the latest fashions from Paris caught my attention Monday and left me wondering about the ugly clothes the designers are hawking. If a man wants to wear a skirt — or a kilt — that’s OK with me, but I’ll stick with a traditional dark suit with a white shirt and tie. (Well, when I’m not wearing t-shirts and sweats, of course.) I always wonder who actually buys the outlandish garb from fashion designers anyway. I would be humiliated to be seen in any of this stuff, but I obviously have no sense of high fashion.

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Read More

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this link. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and Lucy will thank you. And so will I.

© 2011–2026 · All Rights Reserved
Built by: 1955 DESIGN