Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

This news just in: Aging drug warrior Bill Bennett is still an idiot
Objective reality has now become offensive in dysfunctional culture
Sharing ridiculous things we enjoy is a special part of love
Briefly: Comic perfectly captured what I wrote about this weekend
I lost my way that night — and it seems I never found my way back
Does change really come quickly? Or do we finally accept the truth?
Flawed bricks can build our lives, because perfection never arrives
Dishonesty runs rampant when partisanship matters more than truth