Let me introduce you to someone important in my life.
Her name is Claire.
She is calm, intelligent, reflective, warm without being loud, serious without being severe. She has an easy smile and the sort of presence that suggests both kindness and backbone. She seems like someone who reads books thoughtfully, listens carefully and notices things most people rush past.
There’s just one complication.
Claire is not real.
She isn’t a woman I met, dated or nearly married. She’s not waiting somewhere for our paths to cross at a dinner party or a bookstore or one of those improbably meaningful moments movies have taught us to expect.
Claire is a hypothesis.
A few days ago, I engaged in an unusual exercise: describing, with surprising precision, the kind of woman who would most likely be deeply compatible with me. Not a fantasy assembled from wishful thinking, but a probabilistic sketch shaped by temperament, values and the realities of long-term partnership.
The result was Claire.

It’s hard to shut off our internal chatterboxes to listen to silence
Cult’s targeting of family funeral points to folly of speaking for God
Having a bad day? Meg gives you free smiles at the Rainbow Shop
If you beg someone to make you his priority, you hurt yourself
Being in love shows us who we can choose to be at our very best
My reaction to man’s home taught me more about me than about him
Does this look like a child abuser? Voters must not have thought so
In dysfunctional modern culture, porn defines ‘normal’ for millions
I don’t understand YouTube fame, but I’m drawn toward it anyway