Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

FRIDAY FUNNIES
This news just in: Aging drug warrior Bill Bennett is still an idiot
What if repairing my worst flaw meant losing my greatest power?
Need for love drives behaviors; for me, old needs make me eat
Sorry, Newt: It’s not ‘isolationism’ to oppose invading other countries
Trust and spontaneous order don’t require heavy hand of the state
Did GOP and Democrats get their scripts mixed up this time?
Why do tax dollars fund lavish lifestyles for bureaucrats?