The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Am I betraying the truth if I don’t preach to the converted each day?
Laughing at the ‘rapture cult’? Those who believe in the state are no different
Gay marriage debate turns into fight for validation of private beliefs
I don’t know how to amuse you into taking your future seriously
As online holiday shopping starts, please use my Amazon affiliate link
Living without human connection? It’s an empty life with no meaning
Abortion debate gives us lots of candidates for ‘Idiot of the Year’
If Ron Paul was ‘our last hope,’ what’s your backup plan now?
Cats, dogs and children teach me efficiency doesn’t always matter