The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Peace won’t come until you quit obeying long-gone programmers
Obama administration wants to choose skin color of your neighbors
Connection with a child can make routine day feel more meaningful
Be afraid, friends: Chicken Little says the sky is falling somewhere
If you live by your principles, others won’t control your actions
Shallow thinking and arrogance led to ruin of once-great society
Politicians trying to stamp out innovation to help monopolies
‘Let’s Make a Deal’: How democracy is like a dumb old game show