The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Miss. church turns back clock by refusing to marry black couple
Please be patient with my site as it’s being completely remodeled
My fears are less about death than about my own ‘unlived’ life
No, I can’t support your campaign; changing candidates won’t fix things
It’s time to change my story and reinvent myself — one more time
Kids’ willingness to blindly obey shows in Quebec teacher’s joke
Friday nights still take me back to sidelines of high school football
Banning access to guns won’t prevent the evil in human hearts