If cupcakes are topped with little green WW II soldiers, they somehow become dangerous or threatening if they’re brought into a school. Whatever the case, it was enough to get a Michigan 9-year-old and his parents into trouble with his school. It seems like another case of insane “safety” overreach by out-of-touch school administrators.
Casey Fountain’s third grade son brought cupcakes to school last week to share with his classmates in celebration of his ninth birthday. The boy’s mother made the cupcakes and decorated them with small green soldiers that the boy likes — very much like the G.I. Joe figures that every generation of kids has been playing with for decades.
But when the boy got to school with the “insensitive” cupcakes, they were confiscated because of the figures. The principal called the boy’s father and told him that it was insensitive because of the shootings in Connecticut last year. (Did army infantry invade the school? I must have missed that.)
The boy’s father called the media to complain, but the school refused to go on camera to talk about the case, issuing a strange statement instead. Here was the strangest part of the statement:
“On the other hand, there are those who feel that guns create fear in schools and we need to put solid security measures in place plus practice routines to be prepared in case an emergency should ever occur,” the statement said. “Living in a democratic society entails respect for opposing opinions.” [Emphasis mine.]
So this is the school’s way of showing “respect for opposing opinions”?
3 years after my father’s death, happy memories getting stronger
Photo assignment in dimly lit gym kickstarted my love for basketball
I’m not sure what’s left to say about politics, so here’s a picture of a cat
Life is full of choices, but some require us to ‘come before winter’
I didn’t realize this until tonight, but I have been needing to cry
Need for certainty is an internal tyranny that leads to the wrong path
Nobody’s perfect as a mate, but Mary Poppins was pretty close
Boston ‘gay on gay’ assault shines light on absurdity of ‘hate crime’