Since at least the 1960s, the John Birch Society has been fighting a lonely battle to get the United States to pull out of the United Nations and kick the UN out of New York City. If you don’t know anything about the John Birchers, they’re an interesting bunch. They’ve always believed in a world of conspiracies and communists under every rock. When it comes to the UN, though, it just might be that the Birchers had it right from the start.
The United Nations is now calling for confiscating wealth from the “super rich” in relatively prosperous countries in order to send it to poor countries. It’s not an income tax. The proposal is to confiscate 1 percent of the wealth of billionaires. It’s simple theft of an estimated $400 billion in order to send it to corrupt and repressive governments that have run their people into the ground.
I’m not worried about alleged conspiracies for a “new world order” or a fictitious “North American Union.” But I am worried about the fact that more and more people want the UN to function as a world government. A UN agency has recently proposed that it take over the management of the Internet, and the agency chief admitted that part of the purpose is to make sure that small countries’ telecom monopolies are able to make money — by preventing other ways of getting data in and out of the country. Doesn’t that sound like a great excuse for repressive governments?

‘Metaverse’ future seems easy, but humans thrive on challenge
Feeling abandoned by a parent often sets pattern for entire life
Serenity is seeing all sides of life, choosing to continue the journey
Illegal bribes mean a politician is corrupt, but the legal things he does are just as immoral
Why do loving parents let schools teach kids to be conformists?
‘The moment we begin to seek love, love begins to seek us and save us’
Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown: ‘Not every human problem deserves a law’
Relationships he couldn’t mend were tragedy of my father’s death
How could we take responsibility but avoid self-destructive shame?