If there’s one thing that most conservatives and libertarians agree on, it’s about the gospel of privatization. Both groups agree that everyone is better off when governments contract with private companies to perform services.
If you look at the Reason Foundation’s website, you can find all about the glories of privatization and why it’s better than having government employees perform the work.
You’ll see praise of privatizing public works, garbage collection, lotteries and airport screening, among others. I’m sure the facts of the reports and studies are accurate as far as they go, but they’re missing the most basic point, as far as I’m concerned.
If I am forced by a city or state to fork over the money to pay for paving roads or collecting trash or maintaining public parks, how much does it matter to me whether the employees who do the work are government employees or on the payroll of a company that I’m required to support, whether I like the work or not?
I’ve been thinking about this because I’ve been noticing horribly incompetent companies I deal with lately. That’s made me wonder why I should prefer dealing with one of them — if I didn’t have any choice in the matter — rather than government employees. Why is an incompetent private company with a monopoly any better than an incompetent government?
New information demands that I change some of what I think I am
What do we prove with huge houses we can’t afford to pay for or even fill?
Could Hillary Clinton be the next president of the United States?
By end of Pooh movie, I wanted to stay in the Hundred-Acre Wood
After first six podcast episodes, I’m encouraged but still a rookie
Ten years later, it hurts to know she lost faith in me and gave up

VIDEO: Can we do things we love and expect the money to follow?
Fear and shame can leave us in a fog that destroys relationships
Why do we consider it shallow to crave beauty in romantic partner?