If there’s one thing that most conservatives and libertarians agree on, it’s about the gospel of privatization. Both groups agree that everyone is better off when governments contract with private companies to perform services.
If you look at the Reason Foundation’s website, you can find all about the glories of privatization and why it’s better than having government employees perform the work.
You’ll see praise of privatizing public works, garbage collection, lotteries and airport screening, among others. I’m sure the facts of the reports and studies are accurate as far as they go, but they’re missing the most basic point, as far as I’m concerned.
If I am forced by a city or state to fork over the money to pay for paving roads or collecting trash or maintaining public parks, how much does it matter to me whether the employees who do the work are government employees or on the payroll of a company that I’m required to support, whether I like the work or not?
I’ve been thinking about this because I’ve been noticing horribly incompetent companies I deal with lately. That’s made me wonder why I should prefer dealing with one of them — if I didn’t have any choice in the matter — rather than government employees. Why is an incompetent private company with a monopoly any better than an incompetent government?
Galt’s Gulch? I can live without that, but I need my own ‘Akston’s diner’
Sex abuse of powerless rampant; denying its serious harm obscene
In a vulnerable moment, woman confesses she’s scared to change
Lucy’s fun afternoon at my office reminds me that work needs play
We can’t defeat existing system; we must build better one instead
‘You cannot love in moderation’; lukewarm love’s worse than none

Police or storm troopers: What’s become of U.S. law enforcement?
If you accept that you’re a fool, being wrong is a lot less scary
Let others be wrong if they want; it’s not your job to fix their errors