Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

When Demopublicans and Republicrats clash, you lose
Unexpected proposal leaves me pondering my craving to be loved
Existential crisis makes me ask: Can I ever trust you to love me?
Real-life ‘ghost story’: The tale of a house that didn’t want me there
NTSB demands states ban all phone use for drivers, even hands-free
If you play the DC power game, all that matters is the game
What will you do when ‘electing the right people’ doesn’t change things?
What kind of hypocrite gives advice but won’t practice what he preaches?