Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

I don’t understand YouTube fame, but I’m drawn toward it anyway
Nobody can ever be good enough when perfection is the standard
I have a history of ignoring signs that warn me it’s time for change
Life is a game of hide-and-seek; we’re lost if we no longer seek
Try a new game: Make others smile — and let yourself smile with them
Goldwater led to Reagan Revolution; What might Ron Paul’s legacy be?
Free speech is our natural right, not a gift granted by politicians
Here’s why I won’t be watching the presidential candidates ‘debate’
Without real human connection, we’re just living in a simulation