If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

VIDEO: Yes, I’m still going to talk to you about the end of the world
Smart people and profit motive have made world a better place
Sudden realization of hunger for taste of kindred soul is killing me
New Star Trek film is reminder that adults aren’t running Hollywood
The egalitarian lie: Every group has leaders, even Occupy Wall Street
What’s the point of a secret crush if heart isn’t ready to accept love?
Nature’s renewal and growth boost my hope for my own life each year
You’re not watching real news; you’re watching a scripted show