Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

Local politics isn’t a Frank Capra movie; it’s every man for himself
Instinctive desire to ‘do something’ almost always leads to bad policy
W.V. student suspended from school and arrested for pro-gun t-shirt
As you grow, learn to let go of things that no longer serve you
Without growth on similar paths, two people drift apart, love dies
She had issues that scared me, but I felt loved and understood
Take time to give honest praise, even when it’s just about a dog
Barack Obama’s effort to imitate FDR’s ’36 campaign full of danger
Schools’ one-size-fits-all rules are just excuse not to use judgement