Do you remember me telling you in September that straw polls don’t matter? Many of you insisted in emails to me (and in some comments) that straw polls mean a lot. Let’s revisit that discussion.
In mid-August, Michele Bachmann won the Iowa straw poll with 28 percent of the vote. Here’s the lead of a Fox News story reporting her “important” win: “Rep. Michele Bachmann won the Iowa Straw Poll Saturday, affirming her status as a top-tier candidate in the Republican race to challenge President Obama in 2012.”
That was always sheer fantasy. What happened Tuesday in Iowa is reality.
Bachmann finished the actual caucuses — you know, the vote that matters — with roughly 5 percent of the vote. Her 28 percent showing in a straw poll was shown to be irrelevant.
And what of the winners in Iowa on Tuesday. As I write this, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are still neck and neck for a photo finish, but they’re the clear winners. (Ron Paul was in third place, a respectable finish, but far behind his 27 percent in the straw poll — and far away from the predictions of winning coming from his supporters lately.) The two Iowa winners were also-rans in the August straw poll.

NOTEBOOK: Simplistic storytelling on TV news pushing nation to war
Trump apologists hope you don’t even know about the golden calf
Here’s Valentine’s Day music for lonely folks with nobody to love
Coming economic hardship may help me understand Aunt Bessie
Modern life doesn’t have to be as complicated as we try to make it
Will those on the left upset about Halliburton now go after Obama?
Class experiment is evidence: Folks want something for nothing