You might not know Matthew Lesko‘s name, but there’s a good chance you’ve seen or heard one of his ads. He claims to have been researching government grants for more than two decades and he claims to be the expert on “free money for everybody.”
I’ve always found his ads offensive, because there’s something horribly distasteful to me in the idea of “free money.” There’s no such thing as free money. There’s only money that’s been taken from one group of people and given to another group of people — and that’s always seemed very wrong to me.
But I’ve been thinking lately about this issue, and I’m not sure the case is as simple as I’d like it to be. It’s not that I’ve suddenly started approving of governments coercively taking money from people. But the question of what it’s OK for us to accept from government is more complicated — at least for those of us who believe it’s wrong for the money to be available in the first place.
I know a couple who are having a difficult time financially right now. She’s working full-time while he finishes his college degree. They have a young child, and it’s a struggle to make it financially. But he’s a libertarian who hasn’t been willing to take any government assistance. His in-laws watch them struggle and seem disapproving that he won’t apply for any kind of government aid. Is he a principled man who we should admire? Or is he a fool for not taking the help that’s available?

KKK-loving newspaper owner has always been a nut; this isn’t news
A question I’m scared to answer: Why haven’t I made another film?
As sowing comes before reaping, culture comes before politics
What if writing from the ‘AI me’ sounds just like I’d written it?
Three of Colorado shooting victims died protecting their girlfriends
A tax on folks who can’t do math? Winning may be worst possibility
Galt’s Gulch? I can live without that, but I need my own ‘Akston’s diner’
There’s a lot to complain about, but miracle is so much goes right
Watching kids on a Friday night reminds me of struggle to belong