The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Idiotic idea of the year: Turn email over to the U.S. Postal Service
Still relevant six years later: ‘We’re the Government — and You’re Not’
We sometimes need help to finish a long race we’ve decided to run
Rush Limbaugh is just as partisan and ignorant as MSNBC’s Ed Schultz
My father’s narcissistic abuse led to my mother’s attempt to kill him
Political systems built on coercion will always produce cheats, liars
‘I know who you are,’ she said. ‘Do you know who you really are?’
Our greatest apparent strengths frequently lead to our downfall