The Republican National Committee provided another piece of evidence this week that winning is more important to the major parties than anything else. Their lust for power outweighs any impulse they might have to tell people what they really need to know.
Republicans are supposedly the ones who understand that government can’t create jobs, yet the RNC is pandering this week to jobless Americans almost as badly as Democrats might under similar circumstances. It’s all about winning, not about explaining principles or sound policy.
With Barack Obama on his campaign swing through Virginia and North Carolina — which we’re told is not campaigning — Republicans responded with a television ad. If they had wanted an honest ad that reflected the principles they say they believe in, the ad would have attacked Obama for trying to spend money to allegedly create jobs and it would have pointed out the government’s real task is to get out of the way and let the market do the work.
Instead, the GOP’s TV spot is pandering to people who are worried about jobs — by implying that it’s a president’s job to “do something” about creating jobs. It closes by ominously asking, “What about your job?” It’s an ad that’s designed to play to people’s fears and to their emotional reasons for disliking a politician. The cheap shots about fundraising are ironic at best, since every modern president spends time doing the same thing, no matter the party. (There’s a PDF “press corps briefing book” to go along with the ad.)
World has become a freak show, but we’re not supposed to notice
AUDIO: If we’ve experienced hurt, why do we keep trusting in love?
With bumbling federal response, terrorist attack achieved objectives
We’re becoming so selfish that our old ‘social scripts’ are dying
Do we rescue abandoned animals? Maybe they’re rescuing us instead
Hermit life looks good as world tries to make me a misanthrope
On this website’s 10th birthday, I’m planning for the next decade
Double standards seem like the only standards most politicians know
What do we prove with huge houses we can’t afford to pay for or even fill?